Skip to content

Efficacy Triamcinolone acetonide 20mg. VS Dexamethasone 5mg. under ultrasound guided caudal epidural steroid injection in patient chronic low back pain with leg pain: Double-blinded randomized controlled trial study

Efficacy Triamcinolone acetonide 20mg. VS Dexamethasone 5mg. under ultrasound guided caudal epidural steroid injection in patient chronic low back pain with leg pain: Double-blinded randomized controlled trial study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20160725001
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2016-07-25
Start date
2015-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic low back pain with leg pain sciatica sciatica triamcinolone acetonide acetate Dexamethasone caudal epidural steroid injection ultrasound

Interventions

Clinical assistant nurse did not know about information of patient who prepared the injection drugs 20 mg T.A. and 5 mg dexamethasone plus sterile saline (0.9% NaCl).patient was in prone position. ski
Active Comparator Drug,Experimental Drug
Triamcinolone acetonide 20 mg.,Dexamethasone 5mg.

Sponsors

Faculty of medicine
Lead Sponsor
personal support,personal support
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Age 20-70 patients had a history of sciatic pain from degenerative lumbar and sacral structural nerve root compression, completely physical examination included positive specific straight leg raise test, Lasègue test and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed in every patients to confirm the sciatic pain is come from structural nerve root compression with failure improvement sciatic pain symptom from rehabilitation program and generally analgesic drug treatment at least from 3 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: : previous spinal epidural steroid injection from any routes, to ensure that treatment results were not influenced by prior epidural steroid injection use. previous spinal surgery, history of drugs allergy, severe clinical symptom indicate for surgery (progressive pain, progressive neurological deficit , bowel bladder involvement symptom),sciatic pain from infection and tumor mass compression, non structural nerve root compression sciatic-like pain from MRI confirmation, bleeding tendency, infections a injection site, uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes, pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
pain initial, 2 wk,4wk,8wk and 12 wk numerical rating scales (NRS) (0 to 10 scale) ,pain initial, 2 wk,4wk,8wk and 12 wk numerical rating scales (NRS) (0 to 10 scale) ,pain initial, 2 wk,4wk,8wk and 12 wk numerical rating scales (NRS) (0 to 10 scale) ,pain initial, 2 wk,4wk,8wk and 12 wk numerical rating scales (NRS) (0 to 10 scale)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
number of successfull treatment total 12 week define successfull treatment is pain reduction more than 2 point,number of successfull treatment total 12 week define successfull treatment is pain reduction more than 2 point,number of successfull treatment total 12 week define successfull treatment is pain reduction more than 2 point,number of successfull treatment total 12 week define successfull treatment is pain reduction more than 2 point,number of successfull treatment total 12 week define successfull treatment is pain reduction more than 2 point

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactSutthichon Benjawilaikul

Chiangmai university

sutthichon_md@hotmail.com66882677002

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026