Skip to content

EFFECT OF MIRROR THERAPY IN RECOVERING UPPER LIMB STRENGTH AND FUNCTION IN CHRONIC STROKE PATIENTS

Effect of mirror therapy in recoverying upper limb strength and function in chronic stroke patients:randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20140903002
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2014-09-03
Start date
2009-08-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Upper Limb Function in Chronic Stroke Patients Mirror therapy&#44

Interventions

the mirror group participated in a standard stroke rehabilitation program&#44
6 hours a day&#44
for 8&#45
12 weeks. The standard program is patient&#45
specific and consists of neurodevelopmental facilitation techniques&#44
physiotherapy&#44
occupational therapy&#44
and speech therapy (if needed). For the same period&#44
the mirror group received an additional 30 minutes of mirror therapy program by an occupational therapist. During the mirror practices&#44
patient is seated close to a table on which a mirror sized 40&#61620
60&#61620
30 cm. is placed vertically. The paretic hand is placed behind the mirror and the non paretic hand in front of the mirror. The practice consists of non paretic side movement: wrist and finger flexion
pick up the tennis ball and put in the basket&#44
pick up various size of pins&#44
hold the glass and release while patient looks into the mirror&#44
watching the image of his / her non paretic hand&#44
thus seeing the reflection of the hand movement projected over the paretic hand. Patients can see only the non paretic hand in the mirror. During the session patients are ask to try to do the same mov

Sponsors

ARC
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 0 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - A first episode stroke patient with hemiplegia / hemiparesis more than 12 weeks whom was diagnosed by a neurologist and confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging - Age more than 18 year - Are able to understand and follow two steps command - Have a Brunnstrom score between stages I and IV for the arm and hand - Are able to sit with / without support more than 30 minutes - Have no severe cognitive disorders (TMSE score > 24) - Have no other disorder on paretic limb - Consent for study participation by patient / relatives

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Patients who has medical problem(s) that cannot tolerate with the rehabilitation program - Has sensory / global aphasia - Has severe spasticity of arm / hand (MAS ≥ 3) - Has severe neglect - Non-cooperative patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Motor recovery at 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th week after the intervention Brunnstrom stage of recovery,Motor recovery at 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th week after the intervention lateral pinch strength,Motor recovery at 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th week after the intervention Motor Assessment Scale (Thai version),Motor recovery at 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th week after the intervention tip pinch strength

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
ADL at 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th week after the intervention Barthel ADL Index,spasticity at 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th week after the intervention Modified Ashworth Scale

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactKrisna Piravej

Rehabilitation Center

kppmrchula@gmail.com662-2564433

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026