A randomized comparison of minilaparotomy and conventional laparotomy for abdominal hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20130723002

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2013-07-23

Start date

2011-12-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign uterine disease Minilaparotomy Hysterectomy Myoma uteri Early post operative outcomes Post operative pain

Interventions

minilaparotomy incision for abdominal hysterectomy&#44

length 6 cm.,conventional incision for abdominal hysterectomy&#44

length 14 cm.

Experimental Procedure/Surgery,Active Comparator Procedure/Surgery

minilaparotomy,Conventional

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Age

40 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Leiomyoma of uterine, sized 12 - 16 weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Previous abdominal surgery Malignancy Large adnexal mass Pelvic adhsion

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Post operative pan 24, 49 hrs, and day 7 visual analog/ numeric pain scale,Operative time operatiion minute,Operative blood loss operatiion mililiter	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Length of stay at discharge from hospital day	—

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactSomyod Kitisupornpun

none

somyodkiti@gmail.com0818812243

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026