Skip to content

The effectiveness of radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in the management of upper limb spasticity in chronic post-stroke hemiplegia: A randomized controlled trial

The effectiveness of radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in the management of upper limb spasticity in chronic post-stroke hemiplegia: A randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
SLCTR
Registry ID
SLCTR/2019/040
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-12-19
Start date
2019-12-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

stroke

Interventions

The study will be conducted at teaching hospital, Peradeniya and at the Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya.. The control group will receive tra

Sponsors

University of Peradeniya
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Male and female patients aged between 40 to 70 years diagnosed with stroke resulting in hemiplegia more than six months ago 2.Stable spasticity (no variability within two months before recruitment) in upper limb 3. Patients with more than grade three of Modified Ashwath Scale 4. Patients with Voluntary Control Grading from two to four for affected UL 5. Able to maintain standing position for five minutes without manual assistance 6. Able and willing to participate in four weeks study and to sign consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy/ severe shoulder subluxation/ shoulder dislocation/ contracture in the affected UL/ fixed deformity of hand/ shoulder hand syndrome 2.Any neurological disorder or pain that might limits arm movement 3. Patients who have received botox injection or acupuncture within past 6 months to the affected UL 4. Complete sensory loss of upper limb 5. Presence of high risk cardiovascular disorders such as myocardial infarction, heart failure 6. Severe hypertension defined as SBP? 180 and or DBP ? 110 7. Presence of convulsions 8. Patients with visual impairment 9. Patients with behavioral problems 10. Already enrolled in some form of physical therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
•Spasticity grading of affected upper limb using Modified Ashwath scale •Voluntary control of affected upper limb according to a grading system [All the subjects will be assessed for spasticity of upper limb and voluntary control of upper limb immediately after the TENS or rESWT treatment has been given, and at the end of the four weeks treatment session eight, twelve, sixteen and twenty weeks after the first treatment ]

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Fugl - Meyer motor assessment of physical performance of upper limb • Action research arm test [All the subjects will be assessed for hand function grading immediately after the TENS or rESWT treatment has been given, at the end of the four weeks treatment session and after eight, twelve, sixteen and twenty weeks after the first treatment ]

Countries

Sri Lanka

Contacts

Public ContactM.K.I.Dilhari Senarath

Lecturer (Probationary)

dilsenarath7@gmail.com/ dilharisenarath@ahs.pdn.ac.lk0813999623

Outcome results

None listed

Source: SLCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026