Skip to content

Effect of hand skill competence training on classroom activity performance of children with Down syndrome

Effect of Fine Motor Skill competence training on classroom activity performance of children with Down syndrome: A cluster randomized controlled trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
SLCTR
Registry ID
SLCTR/2019/022
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-07-10
Start date
2019-08-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Down syndrome

Interventions

The study setting will be government schools in Matara district where children with Down syndrome are studying but the intervention will be administered in child’s own home. A cluster will be defined

Sponsors

Sajee Anuradha Gamage
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: * Children with a confirmed diagnosis of Down Syndrome and having fine motor deficiency * Children aged between 6-9 years * Both male and female children. * Children with no visual impairments, medical or genetic conditions beyond those associated with Down Syndrome. * Absence of a diagnosis of a co-existing autism spectrum disorder as reported by the parents * Student who attends a regular or special education class in a government school in the Matara district * Children with a principal caregiver who is willing to get involved actively in implementation of the intervention.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: * Children with DS who do not have fine motor deficiency.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Improvement of fine motor skills after 12 weeks of intervention application using Outcome measure: Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2 (PDMS-2) Follow-up assessment (during the period of intervention) which is a different assessment carried out to check and compare the progress of the two group once the intervention has started. [PDMS-2: At the beginning of the trial (at recruitment), at the end of the 6th week after introducing the intervention and at the end of the intervention (12th week). Follow-up Assessment at the end of 4th, 6th,10th and 12th weeks of introducing the intervention]

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Improvement of classroom activity performances using Classroom Activity Performance Assessment (CAPA) [CAPA: At recruitment, 6th week and 12th week after introducing the intervention]

Countries

Sri Lanka

Contacts

Public ContactSajee Anuradha Gamage

Occupational therapist

anuotsg@gmail.com041 2222261-190

Outcome results

None listed

Source: SLCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026