Skip to content

Effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil vs azathioprin on progression of rheumatoid arthritis related interstitial lung disease in patients followed up at the rheumatology clinic, Teaching Hospital Karapitiya – a randomized controlled trial

Effect of mycophenolate mofetil vs azathioprin on progression of rheumatoid arthritis related interstitial lung disease in patients followed up at the rheumatology clinic, Teaching Hospital Karapitiya – A randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
SLCTR
Registry ID
SLCTR/2018/031
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-09-14
Start date
2018-09-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid arthritis related interstitial lung disease

Interventions

Study setting will be outpatient rheumatology clinic, Teaching hospital, Karapitiya Participants will be subject to base line screening tests including pulmonary function test (Forced vital capacity

Sponsors

Teaching Hospital Karapitiya
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients above 18 years of age 2. Both male and female 3. Patients who full fill the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) /European League Against Rheumatism Collaborative initiative (ACR /EULAR) criteria for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. 4. Patients with interstitial lung disease, which are diagnosed either based on surgical lung biopsy or radiologically with use of HRCT. 5. Patients with abnormal diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and Forced vital capacity (FVC) <85% predicted. 6. Low disease activity or remission of arthritis, based on disease activity score calculated by using Disease Activity (DAS 28), without treatment of methotrexate or leflunomide three months prior to the screening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Prior use of oral MMF for more than 4 weeks. 2. Patients with clinical evidence of interstitial lung disease, having other connective tissue disorders other than rheumatoid arthritis 3. Patients with significant pulmonary pathology on CXR or HRCT, other than interstitial lung disease (eg. lung mass or evidence of active or chronic pulmonary infection). 4. Patients with pulmonary hypertension requiring specific treatment 5. patients with evidence of acute infection either in lung or anywhere of the body, whose management would be compromised by either azathioprine or MMF 6. Patients who are having contraindications or allergic reactions to MMF or azathioprine on previous exposure. 7. History of persistent leukopenia (white blood cell count < 4000/mm3) or thrombocytopenia (platelet count<100) 8. Pregnancy (documented by urine pregnancy test) and breast feeding 9. Smoking of cigars, pipes or cigarettes during the past 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Absolute change in FVC (expressed in mL) and DLCO from baseline (point of recruitment) [At baseline 14 months after initiating of therapy]

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change from baseline in diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) at 6 and12 months of treatment initiation. [At baseline and then at 6 months and 12 months after initiating the treatment] Change from baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 6 and 12 months of treatment initiation. [ At baseline and then at 6 months and 12 months after initiating the treatment] Change in 6-minute walk distance after 6 and 12 months of treatment initiation. [ At baseline and then at 6 months and 12 months after initiating the treatment] Assessment of improvement in quality of life by using SF-36 [ At baseline and then at 6 months and 12 months after initiating the treatment]

Countries

Sri Lanka

Contacts

Public ContactDr Kalum Deshapriya

Consultant Rheumatologist

kalumdeshapriya@hotmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: SLCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026