Hemodynamic response during airway insertion
Conditions
Interventions
Study will take place a teaching hospital in the coastal region of Puducherry state, India. Randomization will be by computer generated randomization sequence in blocks of 5.
The intervention arm wil
Sponsors
Vinayaka Missions Medical College
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Male and female adults (>18 years) 2. American society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classes I and II, 3. Normal airway 4. Undergoing elective surgeries of short duration (1 hour or less)
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Full stomach 2. Emergency surgery 3. Significant cardiorespiratory illness 4. Bowel surgeries 5. Laparoscopic surgeries 6. Difficult airway 7. Known allergy to study drugs
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Change in the following haemodynamic parameters 1.1. Pulse rate per minute 1.2. Blood pressure as measured as measured by non invasive automated monitor. (BPL EXCELO) [Immediately before and after LMA insertion] | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Upper airway trauma by visual inspection of the device and the oropharynx [During LMA insertion and LMA removal ] Desaturation (SpO2 <90%), as determined by a AS/3 Compact Anesthesia Monitor [During LMA insertion.] Patient movement on a 2 point scale (present/absent) [During LMA insertion.] Ease of insertion on a 5 point Likert scale (1=very easy and 5=very difficult) [During LMA insertion.] Gagging: On clinical observation [During LMA insertion.] Laryngospasm: On clinical observation [During LMA insertion.] Post-operative sore throat: on a 10 point visual analogue scale / verbal rating numerical pain score (0=no pain and 10 worst pain imaginable) [ During LMA removal.] | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactPrasanna Vadhanan
Professor
Outcome results
None listed