Skip to content

Assessment of functional capacity, falls, frailty and vulnerability of elderly people

Assessment of functional capacity, falls, frailty and clinical-functional vulnerability of frail and non-frail elderly people

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-9zvtc5b
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-06-26
Start date
2024-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frailty

Interventions

G11.427.410.698.277
I02.233.332
The study will consist of a randomized, controlled, two-arm clinical trial, with a non-probabilistic convenience sample, based on the population attending the Center for Living for the Elderly – CONVI

Sponsors

Ana Paula Felix Arantes
Lead Sponsor
Centro de Referência em Hipertensão e Diabetes
Collaborator
Centro de Convivência e Apoio ao Idoso
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
60 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Elderly people over the age of 60 years; elderly people which are not included in a regular physical exercise program

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Elderly people who might have any clinical conditions that contraindicate the practice of physical activity; elderly people with cognitive deficits that might limit the performance of assessments and/or interventions (present under 19 points on the Mini Mental State Examination)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected, after carrying out the intervention, to find an average difference of 30 meters in the functional capacity of the elderly women after reassessment using the Six-Minute Walk Test. It is expected, after carrying out the intervention, to find an average difference of 2 points in the degree of frailty after reassessing the Edmonton Frailty Scale. It is expected, after carrying out the intervention, to find an average difference of 3 points in the degree of clinical-functional vulnerability after reassessment using the 20-item Clinical-Functional Vulnerability Index scale. It is expected, after carrying out the intervention, to find an average difference of 5 seconds during the reapplication of the Timed Up and Go Test among the elderly participants in the study

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
No secondary outcomes are expected

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactAna Paula Arantes

Ana Paula Felix Arantes

ana_paula_arantes@hotmail.com+55 (62) 999758050

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)