Tooth Abrasion
Conditions
Interventions
a total of 22 participants can group. An anamnesis was carried out, where important data regarding the patient could be collected, including his main complaint, then the clinical examination was carri
Other
Sponsors
Centro Universitário Católica de Quixadá
Centro Universitário Católica de Quixadá
Eligibility
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Voluntary patients of both sexes, aged between 18 and 60 years, who had at least two non-carious cervical lesions distributed in different hemiarchies. patients without periodontal disease and without veneers or veneers in the teeth affected by non-carious cervical lesions.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patients with active caries lesion on the remaining teeth of the arch. Unsatisfactory restorations. Recent restorations involving the vestibular surface. Inadequate oral hygiene. Teeth with mobility. Use of orthodontic appliances.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected outcome 1 it is expected to find a successful clinical outcome of restorations with resins composed of new technology of single insertion through the method of blind clinical evaluation with presentation of the parameters of integrity, staining, retention, through scores where there is presence , intermediate and absence.;outcome found 1 it was found that the new composite presented a worse behavior and clinical performance than the conventionally used. In the clinical evaluation of the marginal integrity item, it can be observed that Filtek Z350 XT, 3M resin presents better results when compared to FiltekTM Bulk Fill, 3M-ESPE (p = 0.05), when compared at different times, 1 month and 6 months where the Z350 XT resin achieved 100% success for both evaluation times and the Bulk Fill resin showed a significant reduction, with a success rate of 82%. It can be noted that Bulk Fill resin was inferior in this aspect with 6 months of evaluation. When comparing the different composites with each other in the immediate period and after 6 months, no statistical difference was observed | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected outcome 2 it is expected to assess the postoperative sensitivity of patients after restorative treatment using a clinical examination method using a visual analog scale where 0 is minimal pain and 10 is maximum pain.;outcome found 2 no significant difference was observed in relation to sensitivity (p <0.05) where 10% obtained this characteristic. | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactTalita Mendes
Centro Universitário Católica de Quixadá
Outcome results
None listed