Skip to content

Comparison between two types of Tooth Anesthesia

Efficacy, Latency, Duration and Anesthetic Depth of the traditional Anesthesia method and an In-System Anesthetic Injection without Comfort-In needle in maxillary molars through the Pulp Tester

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-9v37h9
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-10-30
Start date
2017-04-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental caries

Interventions

The 30 volunteer patients selected for the research will receive dental restorative treatment with glass ionomer cement on the right and left side decayed teeth under local anesthesia injection with 1
Procedure/surgery
E06.323.428

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Sergipe
Collaborator
Universidade Federal de Sergipe
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of both sexes; aged between 18 and 30 years; of any ethnic group; marital status; nationality; naturalness; who require local anesthesia to perform class I restorations in the first right (16) and left (26) first molars; also have second right (17) and left (27) molars; no history of pain or trauma; reactive to the electrical stimulus produced by the pulp tester

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients under 18 years of age or over 30 years; history of alcohol and drug abuse; patient with some pathology that contraindicates the use of local anesthetics; anemia / pregnancy; use of action drugs in the CNS; use of analgesics and anti-inflammatories; pacemaker carrier; use of appliances and orthodontic bands and have no upper molar

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The assessment at the end of the study that there is no difference in anesthetic efficacy between the two anesthetic methods verified through the pulp tester in a pulpal anesthesia of up to 60 minutes. ;The evaluation at the end of the study would have less discomfort for the anesthetic technique without needles measured through the visual analog scale from 0 to 10.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes are not expected.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactLiane de Almeida Souza

Universidade Federal de Sergipe

odontoliu@gmail.com+55 (79) 3214 2352

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)