Skip to content

Impact of a Modality of Integrative and Complementary Health Practices in Primary Care: results from a mixed-methods study

Assessment of a modality of Integrative and Complementary Health Practices in Primary Health Care: a mixed-methods study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-9qzb5r6
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-07-30
Start date
2021-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic pain

Interventions

in the second week, two clusters received the intervention and three did not
in the third week, three clusters received the intervention and two did not
in the fourth week, four clusters received the intervention and one did not
This is an open-label clinical trial with a stepped wedge randomization design. The intervention consisted of the application of Biokybernetik Smit, a complementary therapy of German origin developed
however, 40 individuals participated, divided into five groups of eight individuals each (clusters). In the first week, one cluster received the intervention (case) while four did not (control)
and in the fifth week, all five clusters received the intervention. The study concluded after the sixth week of intervention, although care sessions continued until all clusters had received six sessi
E02.190

Sponsors

Faculdade de Saúde Pública da USP
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age 18 years or older; of both sexes; complaint of musculoskeletal pain symptoms in any part of the body for more than 3 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Age below 18 years; with no musculoskeletal pain for more than 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 1: An improvement in pain is expected, as measured by scores on the Brief Pain Inventory. ;Observed outcome 1: Regarding pain, a general improvement gradient was observed, with an average reduction of 18.8 points (out of a total of 110) in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score per intervention (p < 0.05). In other words, each intervention led to an average decrease of 18.8 points in the BPI score. These effects remained significant after adjustment for confounding variables. An additional analysis by dimension showed an average reduction of 6.3 points (out of 40) in the pain intensity dimension per intervention (p < 0.05), and an average reduction of 12.53 points (out of 70) in the pain interference dimension per intervention (p < 0.05). ;Expected outcome 2: An improvement in quality of life is expected, as measured by the scores on the World Health Organization Quality of Life – BREF (WHOQOL-BREF).;Observed outcome 2: Regarding the effect of the intervention on quality of life, the analysis showed a general improvement gradient, with an average increase of 2.8 points in the overall WHOQOL-BREF score per intervention (p < 0.05). In other words, each intervention resulted in a 2.8-point increase in the overall WHOQOL-BREF score (p < 0.05). These effects were also observed after adjusting for confounding variables.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
No secondary outcomes were expected.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactMariana Sato

Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo

marianasato@usp.br+55(11)3061-8100

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)