Flatfoot
Conditions
Interventions
46 volunteers.
Divided into 3 groups.
Group A: (mobilization with movement, plus rigid bandage) = 15 volunteers.
Group B: (mobilization with movement, plus elastic bandage) = 16 volunteers.
Group C: (
Other
E02.190.599
E07.101.036
Sponsors
Universidade Salgado de Oliveira
Universidade Nacional de Brasilia
Eligibility
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Informed Consent Term. Both sexes. Age between 18-50 years. History of ankle sprain injury. Score below 17 on the CAIT questionnaire. Body mass less than 25%.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Disabling pain in any joint of the lower limb including the ankle. They had already undergone surgery on the lower limb. History of lower limb fracture. That they were allergic to the components of the different types of bandage. Any other contraindication to physical exercise.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected outcome: Decreased pain. Evaluation instrument: visual analogue scale of pain. The volunteer was asked to score with the level of before and after technique. On the two days of study.;Observed foci; Data already tabulated for pain. No significant difference between groups. The symptom pain both intra and inter groups, has not had significant difference. 1- Intra and inter-group comparisons of pain measured by VAS in the lower limb with chronic ankle instability. Day 1 Group A Group B Group C p * On reaching (0-10) 1.33 (1.90) 0.18 (0.44) 0.68 (1.55) 0.073 After the tests without therapy (0-10) 1.67 (2.56) 0.12 (0.50) 0.46 (1.72) 0.016 * After the tests with therapy (0-10) 1.06 (2.22) 0.01 (0.05) 0.33 (1.07) 0.128 2nd Day On reaching (0-10) 0.69 (1.67) 0.02 (0.10) 0.46 (1.15) 0.295 After the tests with therapy (0-10) 0.84 (1.76) 0.29 (0.86) 0.64 (1.47) 0.759 After the tests without therapy (0-10) 0.63 (1.43) 0.38 (0.83) 0.53 (1.33) 0.976 p * 0.001 * 0.107 0.546 * Significance level for p <0.05. Statistical test used: Intra-group = Friedman test; Inter-groups = Kruskal-Wallis test. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected outcome: improvement of functional performance. Functional test instrument: Square hop test (agility), Y Balance Test, Standing Heel Rise Test (Resistance). Used before and after technique, on both days of the study.;Observed outcomes; Data already tabulated. There was a functional improvement, only in the agility aspect measured by the Square Hop Test. The others had no improvement in performance, with no significant difference. 1- Intra- and inter-group comparisons of the anterior, posterolateral and posteromedial ranges evaluated by the Y Balance Test in the lower limb with chronic ankle instability. Previous Group A Group B Group C p * 1 day No therapy (cm) 84.73 (4.70) 83.27 (5.38) 83.33 (9.77) 0.809 With therapy (cm) 83.08 (5.85) 83.10 (4.70) 82.99 (8.04) 0.999 2nd Day With therapy (cm) 83.03 (5.71) 83.16 (5.03) 81.77 (5.94) 0.751 No therapy (cm) 83.25 (6.03) 81.71 (5.58) 82.36 (6.34) 0.938 p * 0.394 0.812 0.688 Posterolateral 1 day No therapy (cm) 73.62 (13.04) 79.86 (10.67) 76.20 (15.42) 0.420 With therapy (cm) 75.98 (10.46) 78.66 (9.15) 80.03 (11.59) 0.560 2nd Day With therapy (cm) 79.91 (8.97) 82.22 (8.43) 79.01 (14.41) 0.699 No therapy (cm) 80.92 (8.18) 80.37 (9.16) 81.24 (12.57) 0.971 p * 0.011 * 0.214 0.187 Postero-medial 1 day No therapy (cm) 75.11 (11.63) 80.90 (9.38) 76.52 (13.26) 0.466 With therapy (cm) 76.11 (12.20) 83.66 (10.99) 77.53 (15.29) 0.233 2nd Day With therapy (cm) 80.05 (11) 84.15 (7.85) 80.87 (10.61) 0.477 No therapy (cm) 81.41 (9.80) 83.15 (6.46) 82.85 (13.82) 0.885 p * 0.191 0.071 0.055 Caption: cm = Centimeters. * Significance level for p <0.05. Statistical test used: Intra-group = ANOVA of repeated measurements (Anterior - Group A and C; Postero-lateral and Postero-medial - Groups A, B and C); Friedman test (Previous - Group B); Intergroups = ANOVA (Previous with exception of the 2nd day without therapy, Postero-lateral and Postero medial); Kruskal-Wallis test (Previous on day 2 without therap | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactFrederico Igor Calaça
Universidade Nacional de Brasilia
Outcome results
None listed