Skip to content

Needle-less anesthesia compared to conventional: clinical trial

Comparative Analysis between the Atraumatic and Conventional Anesthetic Technique in Third Molar Removal Surgery:Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-9qm2y5
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-01-09
Start date
2019-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impacted teeth. Unerupted tooth. Tooth, Impacted. Third molar. Tooth, Unerupted.

Interventions

Anesthesia of 14 patients who would undergo surgery for removal of contralateral and symmetrical third molars in the same session, totaling 28 surgeries.After a draw, performed minutes before the proc
Device

Sponsors

CESMAC- Centro de Ensino Superior Maceió
Lead Sponsor
CESMAC- Centro de Ensino Superior Maceió
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 45 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of both genders, systemically healthy, aged between 18 and 45 years and need to remove the contralateral third molars, which were in symmetrical position.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with a history of anesthesia or vasoconstrictor allergy employed, with third molars in non-symmetrical position or who had used anti-inflammatory, analgesic or antidepressant prior to surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 1 Pain score reduction, verified through the visual analogue pain scale, after finding a variation of at least 1 mm after the anesthesia procedure.;Expected outcome 2 Vital sign changes before and after infiltration of anesthetic solutions using both devices. These should be verified by comparing blood pressure, pulse and respiratory rate, based on the finding of variation between their means, before and after anesthetic solution infiltration. ;Expected outcome 3 Patient satisfaction level, verified through a questionnaire made available to the patient after anesthesia, to be completed according to a Likert scale, based on the finding of variation of at least 1 point of the score for each question.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
No Secondary Outcomes Expected.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactHelder;Helder Rebelo;Rebelo

CESMAC- Centro de Ensino Superior Maceió;UFPE- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

rebelo_al@hotmail.com;rebelo_al@hotmail.com+558299818814;+55812126-8817

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)