Skip to content

Clinical longevity of impression-made composite resin restorations and out-of-mouth restorations in destroyed teeth: a clinical study

Clinical longevity of composite resin restorations obtained by 3D printing and semi-direct restorations in extensively destroyed teeth: a randomized clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-9q35d6n
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-11-22
Start date
2024-12-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Restoration Failure

Interventions

A randomized clinical trial of equivalence and parallel groups will be carried out, written according to the SPIRIT Statement standards, where two groups will be evaluated: 1) preparation of composite

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Pelotas - Faculdade de Odontologia
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Pelotas - Faculdade de Odontologia
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Indicate extensive restoration in posterior teeth (molar and premolar); be in good general health to undergo dental treatment; and; agree to participate in the study by signing an informed consent form; both sexes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who do not have at least 12 posterior teeth in occlusion; patients who are undergoing orthodontic treatment or planning to undergo orthodontic treatment; patients with a systemic disease that prevents dental treatment; patients not available for follow-up appointments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary: To evaluate the clinical longevity of 3D printed composite resin restorations (digital flow) and indirect composite resin restorations placed in large cavities in posterior teeth. To assess the occurrence of failures and/or deterioration of restorations, the FDI criteria will be used (Hickel et al., 2023). The FDI criteria consider three categories of clinical evaluation parameters: aesthetic, functional and biological, adopting scores ranging from score 1 (excellent restoration that meets all quality criteria) to score 5 (restoration that needs to be replaced). Other complications and failures that are not considered in the FDI criteria (e.g. de-cementation) will be recorded. The success rate will be calculated considering failure when the evaluation presents scores of 4 or 5 in any of the FDI parameters. All information will be collected through the clinical record developed for the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
No secondary outcomes are expected

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactKauê Collares

Universidade Federal de Pelotas - Faculdade de Odontologia

kauecollares@gmail.com+55 53 3260-2801

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)