FindTrial
Sign In

Proposal of a clinical guideline for attention to women with Urinary Incontinence in public health policy

A proposal of the superiority of clinical evaluation on urodynamics in diagnosis of urinary incontinence in women - UI: Urinary Incontinence

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-9p42nj
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-06-27
Start date
2013-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary incontinence, unspecified

Interventions

We selected 200 women with clinical diagnosis of urinary incontinence, being submitted to the urodynamic study and applied the ICIQ-SF quality of life questionnaire and comparing their results for inc
Procedure/surgery
G08.852.898

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Lead Sponsor
Escola Superior de Ciências da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória, EMESCAM,
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with complaints of urinary incontinence. Patients who submitted to the Urodynamic Study, Patients who signed the Free and Informed Consent Form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient with urinary infection at the moment of the Urodynamic Study. Patients with neurogenic bladder. Patients who refused to sign the Informed Consent Form

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Patients with Urinary Incontinence of Effort are characterized by the ICIQ-SF questionnaire and the exe exam. Patients with Urinary Incontinence and Urinary Incontinence should be submitted to the Urodynamic Study—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes are not expected—

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactJose Carvalho Martins

Universidade Federal de São Paulo

tadeu.carvalho@unifesp.br55-027999898421

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)