Obesity
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Female individuals; aged between 40 and 59 years; body mass index (BMI) between 25 kg/m2 and 39.9 kg/m2; waist circumference above 88 centimeters
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Women with previous diagnosis of changes in the thyroid gland; impaired liver function; impaired kidney function; cardiovascular diseases; cancer; serious illness; using medication that alters weight; diagnosed with psychiatric illnesses. In addition, they will also be deleted; gastrointestinal problems; using drugs that may interfere with body composition
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected outcome 1 To evaluate whether the temporal restriction of food during the night period brings greater metabolic benefits in overweight/obese women during the climacteric. The measurement of this outcome was performed through the analysis before and after the intervention of blood biochemical markers, namely: fasting blood glucose; insulinemia; glycated hemoglobin; triglycerides; total cholesterol and fractions; Mean Estimated Glycemia; Baseline cortisol; aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, performed using a Labmax 400® automatic analyzer and labtest® reagents. And anthropometric assessment before and after the intervention period, namely: body weight in kilograms measured on a Tanita BC601G® scale, height in meters measured using a Standard Sanny ES2030® stadiometer, hip and waist circumferences measured with a Sanny anthropometric measuring tape TR4013®. The techniques used for measurements followed the protocols proposed by Heyward & Stolarczyk (2000) for anthropometric assessments. Intragroup data analysis was performed using the paired Student's t test (parametric) or Wilcoxon (nonparametric). Comparisons of categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson's chi-square test. In order to find the expected outcome, the intensity of the final difference in the metabolic and anthropometric parameters between the groups considered a significance level of p<0.05 for all cases;Outcome found 1 The results showed, in both groups (control and restriction), a significant improvement in weight (final weight loss (kilograms): Control Group – 5.59% x Restriction Group – 6.1%) and in body composition (decrease percentage of body fat: Control Group – 4.35% x Restriction Group – 5.06%), in abdominal fat (percentage loss of waist circumference (cm): Control Group 11.96% x Restriction Group – 11.77% ), glucose metabolism (percentage decrease in fasting blood glucose (mg/dL): Control Group – 11.5% x Restriction Group – 11.57%) and lipid metabolism (pe | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary outcomes are not expected | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Centro de ciências da saúde - Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE