Skip to content

Performance evaluation of different approaches for alveolar bone preservation

Impact of different approaches to alveolar bone preservation on healing and maintenance of bone volume, rehabilitation aesthetics, and patient perception

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-9mp2vsm
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-07-01
Start date
2024-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Implants

Interventions

This is a randomized controlled parallel clinical trial, longitudinal in nature, with 4 evaluation groups. Group 1: 25 adult patients of both sexes, aged between 18 and 80 years, with an indication fo

Sponsors

Associação Unificada Paulista de Ensino Renovado Objetivo
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Paulista
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient aged between 18 and 80 years; both genders; indication for Extraction of a single-rooted tooth; subsequent installation of at least one dental implant; the reasons for Extraction may include the impossibility of restorations due to extensive Caries Lesions, Prosthetic Failures, Root Fractures, or Endodontic Failures; the region to receive implants must present bone dimensions that allow the future placement of the dental implant and adequate prosthetic space; at least three bone walls must be present

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Heavy smokers individuals (more than 10 cigarettes per day); pregnant women; lactating women; uncompensated systemic diseases (Diabetes Mellitus, Osteoporosis, Immunological Disorders, Hepatitis, etc.); use of Corticosteroids, Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory drugs, Immunosuppressive drugs, Estrogen and Estrogen Receptor Modulators, Bisphosphonates, and Calcitonin during the 6 months before the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected that it will be possible to determine the best approach for filling the alveolus in alveolar bone preservation procedures, through analysis of height, width, volume and bone density through tomographic examination

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected that it will be possible to determine the best approach for filling the alveolus in alveolar bone preservation procedures, through evaluations of parameters reported by the patient in terms of morbidity; edema; interference in daily life and aesthetics; evaluation of the immunoenzymatic profile and the pattern of osteogenesis/clasia markers; primary stability of implants; aesthetics of rehabilitation; healing of the donor area

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactRaissa Machado

Universidade Paulista

raissa.machado3@docente.unip.br+55 (11) 55864093

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)