Skip to content

Use of acupressure with breathing technique and relaxation for pain relief in labor

Acupressure associated with breathing technique and relaxation for pain relief during labor: a randomized clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-9mhs8r
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2015-05-22
Start date
2013-01-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Labor, Obstetric, Labor pain

Interventions

Experimental group: 52 women were instructed to perform during labor, slow and deep breathing during contractions, in between the contractions, release of all body muscles associated with slow thoraco
Other
D000529
D019050

Sponsors

Faculdade de Enfermagem da Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Lead Sponsor
Hospital da Mulher "Profº Drº José Aristodemo Pinotti" - CAISM - Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 156 women in labor; 37 weeks gestation or more; single and cephalic fetus; cervical dilation greater than or equal to 4 cm; two or more contractions in 10 minutes; skin integrates on acupressure point.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant women with severe hypertensive disease; pregnancy bleeding; early indication of cesarean section; dilated cervix equal to or greater at 8 cm; analgesic drug use for less than 6 hours of admission in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain control during labor according to the visual analog scale (VAS) graded from 0 to 10, 0 for complete absence of pain and 10 being the worst pain experienced, assessed before, 20 and 60 minutes of treatment.;The average pain score was not different among the three groups at baseline (p=0.098). However, a difference was seen immediately after acupressure (SP6 5.92 ± 2.29 versus placebo 7.60 ± 2.47 versus control 8.50 ± 1.90, p<0.001) and at 60 minutes of treatment (SP6 6.47 ± 2.21 versus placebo 8.09 ± 2.25 versus control 8.75 ± 1.82, p<0.001). These differences were significantly different between groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time of labor; cesarean delivery rate; Apgar in the first and fifth minute of the newborn; use of analgesics and analgesia. ;The duration of labor was significantly different between the SP6 acupressure group [221.5 min (± 162.4 min)] versus placebo [397.9 min (± 265.6 min)] and versus control [381.9 min (± 358.3) min)] (p=0.005); the groups were similar regarding the cesarean section raterates (p=0.255); there was no difference between the Apgar scores in the first minute (p=0.954) and fifth minute (SP6 9.62 versus placebo 9.54 versus control 9.29, p=0.722); use of intravenous or intramuscular analgesic, epidural anesthesia or combined blockade showed no statistical difference (p=0.584) during study.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactReginaldo Mafetoni

Hospital da Mulher Prof. Dr. José Aristodemo Pinotti - CAISM/UNICAMP

mafetoni@unicamp.br+ 55 (19) 35219343

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026