Humans, adults, healthy, with impacted mandibular third molars with an indication for extraction. Third molar
Conditions
Interventions
Comparison of two triangular flaps design for surgical removal of a impacted mandibular third molar.
Split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
On one side, the impacted tooth was accessed with flap A and
E06.892
Sponsors
Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: The patient must be aged between 18 and 40 years, have both impacted mandibular third molars with similar positions and angulation, present periodontal health and have the availability of a preoperative panoramic radiograph.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patients with systemic desabilitation, smokers or using medications that could influence the surgical procedure or postoperative healing.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Periodontal healing after surgical removal of third molar, verified through periodontal evaluations of probing pocket depth and attachment loss, based on the finding of a variation of at least 5% in pre- and post-intervention measurements.;Suture dehiscence of each flap design, verified by medication with a dry point caliper of the distance between the lingual and buccal edge of the surgical wound, from the finding of a variation of at least 5% in the measurements between the 7th, 14th, 30th, 60th and 90th postoperative day. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Patient's perception of different flaps design, verified through a visual scale of pain, discomfort, edema, hematoma, mouth opening limitation and paresthesia on the 7th postoperative day, based on the finding of a variation of at least 5% in measurements between the different groups.;Clinical evaluation of the researcher, verified by evaluating the presence/absence of infection, edema, limitation of mouth opening and ulcers in the region on the 7th postoperative day, based on the finding of a variation of at least 5% in measurements between different groups. | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactTaíse Simonetti
Outcome results
None listed