Skip to content

Comparison of two components in phenol peels

Randomized controlled trial comparing the Efficacy of two components in the Phenol-croton oil formula

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-9c2my6
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-09-17
Start date
2018-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin alterations due to chronic exposure to non-ionizing radiation unspecified/photo-aging

Interventions

Eleven patients will undergo a split-face study of a single randomized session, in one side of the face, standard phenol-croton oil peeling using Septisol® (standard control), and the other side of th
Procedure/surgery
T14.0

Sponsors

Hospital Heliópolis
Lead Sponsor
Hospital Heliópolis
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
50 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: phototypes between I and III according to Fitzpatrick's; photoaging according to Global Photoaging Score Types III and IV; non smoking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Recent history of skin lesions or surgeries in the past three months; Medical history of heart disease and/or arrhythmias of any nature, kidney failure or hepatic disease; Medical history of Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD); Medical history of Iron Overload (Hemochromatosis); Use of oral Isotretinoin (13-cis-retinoic acid) in the past six months; Patients with immunosuppressive Conditions, Decompensated Diabetes or Systemic Conditions which interfere on the healing/scaring process such as Malnutrition and Neoplasms; Personal history of keloid. Smoking. Collagenose. Pregnancy or Breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
We expect that there is no difference between the groups. Clinical evaluation based on a scale of improvement of wrinkles in a 5-point scale: 0 (no improvement) to 4 (complete improvement. ;Expected outcome: > 2 for both arms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
We expect that there is no difference between the groups. Patient opinion evaluation based on a scale of improvement of wrinkles in a 5-point scale: 0 (no improvement) to 4 (complete improvement.;Expected outcome: > 2 for both arms.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactCarlos;Daniella Wambier;Curi

Dermatology Department - Yale University;Hospital Heliópolis

cwambier@alumni.usp.br;danigcuri@hotmail.com+14753006596;+5511996779144

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)