Skip to content

Clinical evaluation of restorations of posterior teeth using different types of composite resins

Evaluation of admira fusion vs admira fusion xtra resins in posterior teeth restorations: randomized double-blind clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-989h4f
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-06-19
Start date
2015-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental caries, dental leakage

Interventions

In this split-mouth study, each patient will receive two direct restorations made with two different composite resins, which will be divided into two groups: Control group - 30 patients will receive d
Experimental group: the same 30 patients will receive in another posterior tooth (molar or premolar) another direct restoration class I or II with the composite resin by bulk fill technique with Admir
Procedure/surgery
E06.323.428

Sponsors

Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP
Lead Sponsor
Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Presence of cavities, fractures or cosmetic demands; first or second molars and permanent premolars needing restorations; should be performed at least two Class II restorations in each patient (the number of restorations of each material should be equal in each patient); presence of the antagonist and the adjacent tooth making contact; pulp vitalized and absence of painful symptoms; teeth that have never been subjected to direct pulp capping; no history of hypersensitivity in the teeth to be restored; size of the isthmus with no more than 2/3 of the intercuspal distance; permanent dentition.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Presence of deleterious habits and bruxism; bad oral health and presence of periodontal disease; patients who are suffering from severe systemic diseases or allergies.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical success rate after 24 months, evaluated by tactile and visual examination by clinical exam, given in percentage.;The success rate after 24 months for restorations with Admira Fusion composite resin was 100% and Admira Fusion Xtra was 96.15%. This difference was not significant.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time necessary to perform the restoration with a timer, given in seconds.;The time necessary to apply the restorative material, make the sculpture, light-cure the increments and complete the restoration was higher for Admira Fusion than Admira Fusion Xtra. The results of t-test for independent samples showed significant differences between the groups.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactCarlos Torres

Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia da Universidade Estadual Paulista de São José dos Campos

carlos.rgt@ict.unesp.br+551239479376

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)