Tooth abrasion
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Adults aged 18 years or older of both sexes; good general and oral health according to the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index; presence of at least 20 functional teeth; presence of at least two non-carious cervical lesions located in enamel and dentin with a minimum depth of 1 millimeter and less than 50 percent of the cavosurface margin in enamel; vital and asymptomatic teeth without contact with removable partial denture clasps; teeth with clinically acceptable restorations on other surfaces; availability to attend follow-up appointments and to sign the informed consent form
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Active periodontal disease with probing depth greater than 3 millimeters bleeding on probing or mobility equal to or greater than grade II; presence of parafunctional habits such as bruxism or clenching of teeth; current use of orthodontic appliances or complete dentures; smoking; pregnancy or lactation; teeth serving as abutments for fixed or removable dentures; inability to attend follow-up appointments or refusal to sign the informed consent form; known allergy or hypersensitivity to any dental material used in the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The fracture and retention rates of restorations will be evaluated at 7 days and 6 months through direct clinical examination by two calibrated and blinded evaluators, using the FDI clinical criteria. Restorations will be classified as acceptable (scores A, B, or C) or unacceptable (scores D or E), and the cumulative failure rate will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with comparisons using the log-rank test (a = 0.05). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| It is expected to evaluate marginal adaptation, surface texture, marginal discoloration, color stability and anatomical shape in 7 days and after 6 months, using the FDI clinical criteria, considering scores A, B or C as acceptable and scores D or E as unacceptable.;It is expected to evaluate postoperative sensitivity, presence of recurrent caries and periodontal response adjacent to the restorations in 7 days and after 6 months, through direct clinical examination and patient reports, recording the presence or absence of each condition.;It is expected to evaluate the operator's perception regarding ease of handling, material consistency, insertion control and general satisfaction immediately after each procedure, using a structured questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 being very bad and 5 being very good. | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná