Dental Restoration Wear
Conditions
Interventions
This is a parallel randomized controlled clinical trial, Unicego. Patients are assigned to intervention groups using a table of random numbers in an excel spreadsheet. The sample will be composed of p
Sponsors
Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo - FORP USP
Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo - FORP USP
Eligibility
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Both genders; Presence of 1 lower molar (First or Second) treated endodontically requiring direct restoration; Endodontic treatment performed for a maximum of 6 months; Presence of antagonist tooth in the dental arch; No parafunctional habits; No temporomandibular disorder; age 18 to 40 years
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Teeth with extensive loss with indication of indirect restorations were excluded from the study; teeth with root involvement such as fractures or cracks, patients with poor oral hygiene, patients with chronic or aggressive periodontitis, teeth that were endodontically treated for more than 6 months and teeth without provisional cavity sealing
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected Outcome 1: It is expected that the use of the bioactive composite does not influence the restorative treatment of endodontically treated teeth, presenting results similar to composite resins in the criteria of Retention, marginal discoloration, caries recurrence, restoration color, marginal pigmentation, anatomical shape , and similarity in radiographic success (adequate contact point, absence of radiolucent line, absence of lacks and excesses);Outcome found 1: Greater wear of the anatomical shape and color difference was observed in the period of 6 months for the group that received the bioactive composite, compared to the material used for the control group (Composite Resin) verified by means of the modified USPHS criteria, between the pre and post-intervention periods. The other criteria such as retention, marginal discoloration, caries recurrence, marginal pigmentation, and radiographic success, both materials showed the same results by the evaluation | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary endpoints are not expected | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactSilmara Corona
Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo - FORP USP
Outcome results
None listed