Skip to content

Treatment of multiple gingival recessions with a synthetic graft compared to the graft of the patient.

Treatment of Adjacent multiple gingival recessions with 3d Collagen matrix compared to Subepithelial connective tissue graft - GRT GINGIVAL RECESSION TREATMENT

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-974c9j
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-11-09
Start date
2017-12-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival recession

Interventions

The interventions performed in this study are described in the following experimental group: controle: Coronally advanced flap (CAF) associated with subepithelial tissue graft and test:
E06.892

Sponsors

Centro de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa-CEPPE Universidade Guarulhos
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age> 18 years and 2 mm Miller type I,II Miller, 1985 involving 2 to 3 contiguous teeth premolars, canines and or upper incisors with identifiable cemento enamel junction and without non carious cervical lesions 1 mm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: smoking; Pregnancy; Presence of systemic disorders diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, or any other condition that could contraindicate periodontal surgery ; Use of medications immunosuppressant, phenytoin, or anything else that might affect mucosal healing and repair, previous periodontal surgery in the area

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
There is no difference in the reduction of gingival recession height after one year of treatment between the two groups, verified by means of a periodontal probe, from the observation of a variation of at least 0.35 mm in the post intervention measurements.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
There are no differences between the groups for visible plaque, depth of probing, relative clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing, keratinized tissue width, recess width and dentin hypersensitivity, verified by means of periodontal examination, in the evaluation of one year post treatment . There is no difference between the groups for the thickness of the keratinized tissue, verified by means of a digital spacer and pachymeter, at one year post treatment evaluation.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactEdwin Meza Mauricio

Centro de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa-CEPPE Universidade Guarulhos

jomemau60@gmail.com+55 11 24641684

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026