Skip to content

Comparison of different methods of obtaining of an extubation predictor index in patients subjected to mechanical ventilation

Comparison of different methods of obtaining the rapid shallow breathing index in patients subjected to mechanical ventilation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-96cwz48
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2021-02-03
Start date
2018-08-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation, Intratracheal

Interventions

Cross-type study, in which all individuals (33 intubated patients, on mechanical ventilation and undergoing spontaneous breathing test) will be subjected to 4 different ways to obtain a weaning predic
continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with pressure of 5cmH2O with pressure triggering) pressure (2cmH2O) and CPAP with pressure of 5cmH2O and flow trigger (2LPM) The ventilator data will be coll

Sponsors

universidade federal do espirito santo
Lead Sponsor
universidade federal do espirito santo
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: admitted to the Intensive care unit; intubated and on mechanical ventilation for at least twenty four hours; undergoing the spontaneous breathing test; hemodynamically stable; without administration of vasopressors or sedatives; with a arterial oxygen pressure and inspired oxygen fraction ratio above two hundred.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: tracheostomized individuals; reintubated in the last seven days; whose family member or guardian refused to sign the informed consent form.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluate the value of the rapid and shallow breathing index collected by means of a ventilometer and obtained by means of mechanical ventilation parameters (in support pressure and continuous positive pressure in the airways with pressure and flow triggering). Data collected during the spontaneous breathing test. It is expected to find a significantly lower IRRS value in the support pressure than in the ventilometer, with no difference between this and that obtained in CPAP mode. For such comparisons, a p value of 0.05 will be used.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluate the value of tidal volume and respiratory frequency collected by means of a ventilometer and that obtained by means of mechanical ventilation parameters (in support pressure and continuous positive pressure in the airways with pressure and flow triggering). It is expected to find significantly higher tidal volume and significantly lower respiratory rate values ??in support pressure than in the ventilometer, with no difference between these and that obtained in CPAP mode. Data collected during the spontaneous breathing test. For such comparisons, a p value of 0.05 will be used.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactHalina Duarte
halinaduarte@yahoo.com+55-027-3335-7201

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)