Skip to content

Study of infected hip and knee joint prostheses using the sonication technique

Epidemiological and microbiological study of hip and knee infected arthroplasties using the sonication technique

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-94qz3ym
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2021-02-12
Start date
2010-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

hip and knee prosthetic joint infection Sonication. Arthroplasty. Prosthesis-related infections /diagnosis. Biofilm. Tissue Culture Techniques.

Interventions

Prosthesis replacement due to suspected infection Tissue and sonication culture 146 patients
E04.690
C01.685

Sponsors

Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients who underwent total and partial hip and knee arthroplasties, with the implant removed for sonication.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Absence of collection of peri-prosthetic tissue in the intraoperative moment; Obvious contamination of orthopedic implants during their removal and/ or transport; Patients whose arthroplasties were not submitted to sonication due to the unavailability of suitable containers for transporting the implant at the time of removal or the absence of containers in the institution.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the performance of implant sonication cultures compared to tissue cultures in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection, using the modified clinical criterion, and the diagnostic criteria proposed by International Consensus Meeting (ICM), Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) e European Bone and Joint Society (EBJIS); were used to compare the performance of microbiological tests McNemar´s test and proportion comparison were employed to calculate p-value; sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of each test were calculated using the proposed diagnostic criteria.;Describe the epidemiological aspects of the patients; descriptive; mean, median and standard deviation were calculated for numerical variables.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Describe the microbiological profile of infections of primary joint prosthesis and revision prosthesis; descriptive;Describe cultures with discordant and discrepant pathogens found in the two different tests used (tissue culture and sonicated fluid); descriptive

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactTaiana Ribeiro
taiana_7@hotmail.com(+55)11966216446

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)