Skip to content

Blood flow occlusion in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Blood flow restriction with different load levels in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-93rx9q
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-10-01
Start date
2021-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Interventions

75 individuals, 50 years old and over, with knee osteoarthritis will be aleatory allocated into two groups: 1) Experimental groups: individuals will be divided into 4 subgroups that will perform knee-
b) 80% of BFR without load (n=15)
c) 40% of BFR with low load (n=15)
and d) 80% of BFR with loe load (n=15) 2)Control group (n=15): individuals will perform knee-extension training with high load of 80% of maximum repetition (MR) associated with placebo BFR The train
Other
G11.427.410.698.277

Sponsors

Universidade Federal do Amapá
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal do Amapá
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
50 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Individuals of both sexes will be included; 50 years old and over; diagnosed with bilateral or unilateral knee osteoarthritis (OA) according to American College of Rheumatology criteria; moderate tosevere (scores between 5 and 13 on the Lequesne Questionnaire); with a minimum score of 24 points in the Mini Mental State Examination and who sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Individuals with a history of surgery or any invasive procedure of the affected knee(s) will be excluded; who have undergone a physical therapy or strengthening program for knee injuries in the past three months; planned events, such as knee replacement or travel, which may interfere with individuals' participation during the study period; history of acute myocardial infarction and / or stroke; history of peripheral arterial disease and / or deep vein thrombosis; history of cancer that has generated limitations or restrictions to physical exercise; decompensated systemic blood pressure without medical supervision and changes in dose or type of anti-inflammatory or analgesic drugs in the last three months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluate knee joint pain levels before and after treatment, using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Pain considering the anchoring points that vary from 0 mm of the line "without pain" and "worst pain imaginable" in 100 mm of the line

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To investigate the severity of osteoarthritis, using two instruments: the Lequesne Algofunctional Index and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), from scores of their total scores ranging from 0 (without involvement) to 24 (extremely severe) ) and 0 (best health) to 100 (worst possible health) respectively;Assess the functional level through the instruments: a) Time Get Up and Go Test (TUG), considered changed if the time to perform the test exceeds 12 seconds b) 30 second Chair Stand Test (30sCST), when classifying physical performance as reduced if repetitions less than or equal to 8 are performed in 30 seconds, and not reduced when the number of repetitions is greater than 8 c) 40m Fast Paced Walk Test (40mFPW), through clinically significant improvement if there is a minimum increase of 0.2 meters per second in the average speed of the route taken after the intervention d) Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance Modified, by staying for 30 seconds in six sensory conditions. If any instability occurs before 30 seconds the test is finished and considered changed;Evaluate the level of physical activity, using the Brazilian version of the International Physical Activity Questionaire (IPAQ), long version, by calculating the estimated energy expenditure in METs (metabolic equivalent);Evaluate the muscle strength of the knee extensors using the MicroFET2® manual dynamometer (Hogan Scientific - USA), from the knee extension in an isometric and maximum way for 3 to 5 seconds, in which three measurements of the evaluated limb will be performed, with rest 60 seconds between each assessment, considered the highest peak force value between the three measurements;Evaluate quality of life, using the Brazilian version of the generic SF-36 quality of life questionnaire, through the score of 8 domains ranging from 0 to 100, in which the highest score reflects the best function;to investigate discomfort during sessions, using

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactAreolino;Natália Matos;Iosimuta

Universidade Federal do Amapá;Universidade Federal do Amapá

areolino.matos@gmail.com;naticriosimuta@gmail.com+5596981145505;+5596991901395

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026