Alveolite
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: The criterion for inclusion of patients in the study was the presentation of at least one residual root or indication of exodontia (teeth severely destroyed to the point of rendering their restoration unfeasible, or by prosthetic indication). These teeth could be of the maxilla or jaw (excepting the molars), that is, incisors, canines and premolars. In addition, the individual should agree to participate in the study by signing the TCLE.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: The exclusion criteria consisted basically of patients with some factor that contraindicated the surgical procedure, such as: infection installed at the site; uncontrolled systemic disorders, such as diabetes and hypertension; problems in the coagulation cascade; severe anemia; allergies; patients who used some medicine with interference in bone metabolism; pregnant patients; and patients who used drugs that stimulated gingival augmentation (antihypertensives, anticonvulsants, calcium channel blockers, among others), asthmatic patients without the opinion of the penumatologist and patients who had recently had Chikuncunha.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The main outcome will be the ability of the minimally invasive surgical device to perform or not perform dental extraction, assessed by counting the total number of extractions performed without the aid of additional surgical techniques, these compared with the number of extractions in which operator was unable finish surgery without the aid of additional surgical techniques. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| It will be pain evaluated as postoperative by the Visual Analogue Scale, a scale in the form of a ruler that goes from 0 to 10, with 0 being the absence of pain and 10 considered maximum pain. The average of the group that performed the surgery only with the extractor will be compared with the average of the group that needed other additional surgical techniques to perform an extraction.;The patient will perform a globally assessment on a 5-point scale (0, bad; 1, reasonable; 2, good; 3, very good; and 4, excellent). The average of the group that performed the surgery only with the extractor will be compared with the average of the group that needed other additional surgical techniques to perform an extraction.;The patient will perform a globally assessment on a 5-point scale (0, bad; 1, reasonable; 2, good; 3, very good; and 4, excellent). The average of the group that performed the surgery only with the extractor will be compared with the average of the group that needed other additional surgical techniques to perform an extraction. | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte;Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte