Skip to content

Evaluation of dental extraction technique with minimally traumatic extractor

Evaluation of surgical technique with minimally traumatic extractor

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-93rvm9
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-07-09
Start date
2018-01-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alveolite

Interventions

Performing surgeries for dental extraction of 40 dental elements (including incisors, canines and premolars) using the Maximus® Atraumatic Dental Extractor kit to evaluate the success or not of its us
Device
Procedure/surgery
E06.892
E05.325

Sponsors

Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte
Lead Sponsor
Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The criterion for inclusion of patients in the study was the presentation of at least one residual root or indication of exodontia (teeth severely destroyed to the point of rendering their restoration unfeasible, or by prosthetic indication). These teeth could be of the maxilla or jaw (excepting the molars), that is, incisors, canines and premolars. In addition, the individual should agree to participate in the study by signing the TCLE.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The exclusion criteria consisted basically of patients with some factor that contraindicated the surgical procedure, such as: infection installed at the site; uncontrolled systemic disorders, such as diabetes and hypertension; problems in the coagulation cascade; severe anemia; allergies; patients who used some medicine with interference in bone metabolism; pregnant patients; and patients who used drugs that stimulated gingival augmentation (antihypertensives, anticonvulsants, calcium channel blockers, among others), asthmatic patients without the opinion of the penumatologist and patients who had recently had Chikuncunha.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The main outcome will be the ability of the minimally invasive surgical device to perform or not perform dental extraction, assessed by counting the total number of extractions performed without the aid of additional surgical techniques, these compared with the number of extractions in which operator was unable finish surgery without the aid of additional surgical techniques.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
It will be pain evaluated as postoperative by the Visual Analogue Scale, a scale in the form of a ruler that goes from 0 to 10, with 0 being the absence of pain and 10 considered maximum pain. The average of the group that performed the surgery only with the extractor will be compared with the average of the group that needed other additional surgical techniques to perform an extraction.;The patient will perform a globally assessment on a 5-point scale (0, bad; 1, reasonable; 2, good; 3, very good; and 4, excellent). The average of the group that performed the surgery only with the extractor will be compared with the average of the group that needed other additional surgical techniques to perform an extraction.;The patient will perform a globally assessment on a 5-point scale (0, bad; 1, reasonable; 2, good; 3, very good; and 4, excellent). The average of the group that performed the surgery only with the extractor will be compared with the average of the group that needed other additional surgical techniques to perform an extraction.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactAdyelle;ERASMO FREITAS DE Ribeiro;SOUZA JUNIOR

Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte;Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte

adyelle.d@hotmail.com;erasmo_jn@hotmail.com+558433152248;+558433152248

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)