Skip to content

Comparison between Ceftriaxone and Crystalline Penicillin for the treatment of Ocular Syphilis

Ceftriaxone versus Crystalline Penicillin for the treatment of ocular Syphilis: a randomized clinical trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-92wcttd
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-04-03
Start date
2025-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Syphilis, unspecified

Interventions

This is a two-arm randomized controlled clinical trial. Participants in group A will undergo treatment with crystalline penicillin 4 million units IV every 4 hours for 14 days. Participants in group B
D02.065.589.099.249.190.190.155

Sponsors

Hospital de Clínicas da UNICAMP
Lead Sponsor
Hospital de Clínicas da UNICAMP
Collaborator
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Individuals, male or female; over 18 years of age diagnosed with ocular syphilis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of previously treated syphilis; allergy to penicillin or cephalosporin; immunocompromised individuals not infected with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV); concomitant severe eye disease that may compromise the analysis of response to treatment of syphilis uveitis (e.g., diabetic macular edema, age-related macular degeneration, previous blindness for other reasons); refusal to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the non-inferiority of ceftriaxone compared to crystalline penicillin in the treatment of ocular syphilis in clinical and laboratory terms. Clinical success will be considered: improvement in visual acuity (gain of 10 letters in relation to the first evaluation); improvement in inflammation (decrease in intraocular inflammation by 2+ cells in the anterior chamber or vitreous haze or decrease in parameters to "zero", following criteria of The SUN Working Group Activity of Uveitis Terminology); anatomical improvement on optical coherence tomography examination - restructuring of the outer layers and/or reduction in the central subfield thickness by 10%; improvement in image patterns on fluorescein angiography demonstrating inactive vasculitis. Laboratory success will be considered: drop of two VDRL titers 6 months after treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
No secondary outcomes are expected.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactRoberto Reis

Roberto dos Reis

rdreis@unicamp.br+55(19)35212121

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)