Skip to content

Study of maxillary sinus lift surgery with atraumatic techniques

Comparative analysis of maxilar sinus lift by the atramatic and osseodensification techniques - prospective, randomized, controlled and split mouth study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-92vx4g
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-11-06
Start date
2019-03-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alveolar Bone Loss

Interventions

To perform this research, a sample of 20 patients. On one side of the maxilla will be installed implants with breast lift using osteotomes of summers and on the other side of the maxilla the implants
Procedure/surgery
D25.339.312

Sponsors

Universidade Positivo
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Positivo
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria are: bilateral edentulous patients in the posterior maxillae who require atraumatic bilateral maxillary sinus lifting; presenting a minimum of 5mm bone height (bone crest to inferior wall of maxillary sinus); willing to volunteer in accordance with the Informed Consent Form; to undergo clinical, photographic and tomographic examinations, implant installation with bilateral maxillary sinus lifting; as well as, they should commit to the clinical and tomographic follow-up returns.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria are: patients with indication for implant placement only in one maxillary hemiarch; patients with indication of left and right maxillary implants, but with indication of sinus lift in only one or without indication of lift; Smoking patients; patients with systemic diseases; pregnant or lactating patients; patients who use medications that may interfere with the healing process; patients with periodontal diseases or carious and endodontic lesions; patients under 18 years and patients not committed to treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 1: It is expected to increase the primary stability of implants installed by osseodensification compared to the conventional atraumatic maxillary sinus lift technique with Summers osteotomes; primary stability of these implants will be measured in the transsurgical and postoperative period of three months.;Expected outcome 2: It is expected that bone density in low quality bone in subantral region when using the osseodensification technique will be higher when compared to the atraumatic maxillary sinus lifting technique with Summers osteotomes, the bone density will be measured through cone-beam computed tomography in the preoperative, immediate postoperative and three-month postoperative periods.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected Secondary Outcome 1: Implant torque expected to be greater for implants fitted by osseodensification

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactBruno Candido

Universidade Positivo

brunocandiido@gmail.com+55-041-33173000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)