Skip to content

Comparison between two types of implants in patients with a history of aggressive periodontitis

Comparison between two implant surfaces in patients with a history of aggressive periodontitis: randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-92qgnb
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-07-11
Start date
2018-09-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Loss of teeth due to accident, extraction or periodontal disease

Interventions

20 patients in the control group: Placement of one titanium dental implant associated with metal-free after 6 months of implant healing 20 patients in the intervention group: Placement of one zirconi
Procedure/surgery

Sponsors

Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
21 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Older than 21 years; Need for rehabilitation of at least two dental elements with two dental implants, located in the same arch; Systemically healthy, without contraindications to oral surgical procedures; Proper oral hygiene (bleeding on probing less than 20%; plaque index less than 20%); Aggressive Periodontitis already treated; Signature of the free and informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy or lactation; Existence of metabolic bone disease; Use of drugs that influence bone metabolism; Use of bisphosphonates in the last 4 years; History of malignant tumor, radiotherapy or chemotherapy in the last 5 years; Smokers (greater than 20 cigarettes/day).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 1 Loss of peri-implant bone tissue, determined by the difference of vertical distance between implant shoulder to marginal bone level from baseline (2 to 4 weeks after final reconstruction) to 1-year values

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 1 Long-term performance of marginal peri-implant bone level from baseline to 3 and 5-year values, verified by standard periapical radiographs, from the observation of a variation in millimeters compared to the initial periapical radiography;Expected outcome 2 Clinical outcomes at baseline, 1, 3, and 5-years, verified through periodontal clinical examination, from the observation of a variation in millimeters compared to the initial examination

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactGiuseppe Romito

Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo

garomito@usp.br+55 011 26488172

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)