Heart Failure, Unstable Angina, Coronary Disease.
Conditions
Interventions
Experimental group: will consist of 100 individuals who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery and / or valvular heart surgery and who were admitted to the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Uni
2) hip flexion and extension (30 to 60°) and knee. The exercises will be performed 2 (two) times a day, according to the
Device
E02.760.169.063.500.387
E02.779.474
Sponsors
Hospital Santa Izabel - Santa Casa de Misericórdia da Bahia
Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública
Eligibility
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Patients of both sexes; aged 18 or older; admitted to the ICU and underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery and / or valve replacement.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patients with change of the level of consciousness; motor- or neurological impairment; with persistent hemodynamic instability.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Presentation of the expected outcome 1: difference in functional, by mean values of the walking speed from the finding of the difference of, at least, the 0.1m/s between the groups. The walking speed was evaluated after the intervention of the groups Cycle and Control (active kinesiotherapy). after discharge from the ICU.;Presentation of the outcome found 1: the walking speed averages were similar between group.(0,47 ± 0,21 in Cycle group; versus 0.44 ± 0.23m/s; P=0.34). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected outcome 1: Reduction of 5% of length of stay hospital in the Group Cycle in relation to the Control group. Data evaluated through the electronic medical record after discharge.;Outcome found 1: There was no difference in length of stay hospital between groups. The group Cycle presented a median of 9(7-15)days and 9(7;17)days for the Control group, p=0,66.;Expected outcome 2: Comparison of walking speed betweem active and sedentary people in each group. IPAQ - International Pysical Activity Questionnaire. Short version ;Outcome found 2: There was no difference in the walking speed in the group Control (0.46 ± 0.23m/s for active and 0.41 ± 0.24m/s for sedentary; p=0.36). In Cycle group, active patients presented walking speed superior to the sedentary(0.52 ± 0.24m/s versus 0.41 ± 0.15m/s, p=0.01). | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactPatrícia Viana
Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública
Outcome results
None listed