Skip to content

Improvement in the quality of surgeon's hand preparation to prevent Surgical Site Infection in cardiac, thoracic and orthopedic surgeries.

Promoting quality of Surgical Hand Preparation with Alcohol Solution for prevention of Surgical Site Infection in thoracic, cardiac and orthopedic surgery

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-8ym9yj
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-01-02
Start date
2017-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The study will be conducted in healthy humans. Problems that will be investigated will be the presence of redness, scaliness and fissures in the hands of surgeons. Health Sciences Descriptors: Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue

Interventions

The present study consisted of two phases. STAGE 1: For three months the 33 surgeons of the teams that made up the study population used brushes with PVP-I or CHG degerming solution for the surgical p
Other
D02.033.375
D02.033.755.600

Sponsors

Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto
Lead Sponsor
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto
Collaborator
World Health Organization Implementation Research Regional Training Centre for the Americas’ Region
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Being a surgeon of cardiac and orthopedic teams working in the study hospital

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Do not participate in any surgical procedure in one of the study stages.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected Outcome: The hypothesis of the study is that the surgeon's skin will present less redness, scaly and fissures performing the surgical preparation of the hands with alcoholic solution compared to the degermants. This evaluation was performed by application by WHO instrument assistants while surgeons prepared the hands with degermante solution and alcoholic solution. This instrument consists of the items redness, scaly, fissures and visual skin scale score. Each item has its score scale. Thus the observer assigned a score from 0 to 4 in the item “redness”, 0 for “not red”, 1 for “slightly reddish or mottled”, 2 for “moderate redness, evenly distributed”, 3 for “bright red, scattered ”and 4“ very bright red ”, from 0 to 3 in the items“ scaly ”, being 0 for“ no scaly ”, 1 for“ very little or occasional ”, 2 for“ moderate ”and 3 for“ very pronounced separation of edges of the skin scale ”from 0 to 3 also for“ cracks ”, 0 being“ no cracks ”, 1“ very thin ”, 2“ large single or multiple ”and 3“ extensive cracks with bleeding or secretion ”. In addition, the observer scored a “visual skin scale score” of 0 to 5, with 0 for “no observable scale or irritation of any kind”, 1 for “occasional scale not necessarily evenly distributed”, 2 for “dry and / or red skin”, 3 for “very dry whitish-looking, rough to the touch and / or reddish but not cracked” skin, 4 for “cracked skin but no bleeding / discharge” and 5 for "Extensive skin surface cracks with bleeding / discharge".;Outcome found: When comparing the use of alcoholic solution with PVP-I and CHG for the surgical preparation of the hands, there was no statistically significant difference in the items “redness”, “scaliness”, “cleft” and “point of view” in the hands of the surgeons who used it. PVP-I and alcohol solutions. However, when comparing CHG solution and alcohol solution, there was a difference in the “redness” item, ie, surgeons more often presented redness when using alcohol (57.1%) compared to the time when

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected Outcome 2: The hypothesis of the study is that the surgeon's skin will have better acceptability of the alcoholic solution compared to the degermant. This evaluation was performed through the application of a WHO instrument while after the surgeons prepared the hands with the degermant products and the alcoholic solution. The professional scored on a Likert-type scale his own opinion about product tested in the items “color” and “odor” (1 = unpleasant to 7 = pleasant), “texture” (1 = very viscous to 7 = not at all viscous ), “Irritation” (1 = very annoying at 7 = not at all annoying), “dryness” (1 = with very dryness at 7 = no dryness effect), “ease of use” (1 = very difficult to 7 very easy), “drying speed” (1 too slow at 7 = very fast), “application” (1 = very unpleasant at 7 = very nice), and “overall rating” (1 = dissatisfied at 7 = very satisfied ).;Outcome found 2: In comparing the acceptability of the solutions used in surgical hand antisepsis, there was no difference in the evaluation of the items “color”, “odor”, “irritation”, “dryness”, “ease of use”, “application” and “general evaluation”. CHG versus alcohol solution, however, there was a difference regarding the evaluation of the item “texture”, with the surgeons considering the alcoholic solution with better texture in relation to the degenerating CHG (71.4%). When compared PVP-I with alcohol solution there was no difference of evaluation in the items “irritation” and “ease of use”, but there was difference in the evaluation of the items “color”, “odor”, “texture”, “dryness”, “ application ”and“ general evaluation ”, that is, the surgeons considered the alcoholic solution with the most pleasant color and odor (73.3% and 66.6%), of better texture (60%), with less drying effect on skin (60%), more pleasant application (66.6%) and greater satisfaction with the overall assessment (66.6%). For data analysis, the items of the instrument were dichotomized into an evaluation considered good (yes or

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactAna Elisa Lopes

Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto

anaelisarl@gmail.com55-016-36022319

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026