Skip to content

Effects of training withi an arm ergometer adapted on the functionality and exercise capacity of COPD patients

Effects of training withi an arm cycle ergometer adapted in functional and exercise capacity in patientes with COPD - COPD: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-8ym65t
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-10-05
Start date
2018-11-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Interventions

The protocol will last for 8 weeks, with sessions three times a week lasting 50 minutes each session. Intervention Group: initially, stretching the main muscle groups, then begins the exercises in arm
Other
Q65.060

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of COPD based on clinical and spirometric criteria; Gold classification 2 or 3 (GOLD, 2018); Non-smokers or former smokers; Clinically stable in the month prior to the beginning of the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Individuals with musculoskeletal diseases that preclude participation in the protocol such as arthroses, tendinitis and upper limb (UL); Neurological diseases with involvement of UL; Individuals who can not complete any of the proposed activities; Exacerbation during the collection period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Increase of 1.75 min after intervention in exercise tolerance measured by Constant-Load Test on upper limb cycle ergometer to 75% of the work rate observed in Upper Limb Incremental Exercise Test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Reduction of at least one minute in the AVD-TGlittré.;Improvement of 4% in the total score or in one of the domains of the Sain't George Respiratory Questionnaire.;Clinically Important Minimum Difference values are not established for the 6-minute Pegboard and Ring Test, therefore, it will be considered a significant difference beyond p-value greater than 0.05, values greater than the Minimum Detectable Difference (DMD95).

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactLuana Aparecida Gonzaga

Universidade Federal de São Carlos

professoraluanafisio@gmail.com+5518996839483

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 17, 2026