Skip to content

Effects of resistance training in Systemic Sclerosis

Effects of lower limbs resistance training on strength, muscle mass and physical function in Systemics Sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-8xg74vp
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-01-30
Start date
2022-11-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Systemic sclerosis

Interventions

Participants will be randomized in 4 blocks of 4 participants into 2 groups (moderate-intensity resistance training (MIT) and home training (HT)). The researchers responsible for patient assessment an
E02.760.169.063.500.387.875

Sponsors

Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
45 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women; minimum age 45 years; diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis according to the American College of Rheumatology

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Overlapping autoimmune diseases, except sjögren syndrom; use of ergogenic resources; uncontrolled heart or circulatory disease; palpitation; pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) > 35mmHg; forced vital capacity (FVC) < 70% of estimated; inability to adhere to home-based training; inability to understand and sign the informed consent form

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected to find an increase in muscle strength after 12 weeks of resistance training, evaluated by the method of 1 maximum repetition for the knee extension exercise, with a difference of 3.14(1.9)kg between the resistance training moderate intensity and home based training groups .

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
We expect to find an increase in muscle quantity and improvement in muscle quality, as assessed by dual-energy x-ray absopciometry (DXA) and ultrasonography, respectively. This improvement should occur in both groups, but will be greater in the RT-MI group.;We expect to find an improvement in physical performance evaluated through the short physical performance battery (SPPB), Timed Up and Go (TUG) tools and the 30-second sit-to-stand test;It is believed that there will be superior adherence to treatment in the TR-MI group when compared to the TD group. This will be evaluated through the records of presence in the RT-MI group and the training diary, which appears in the participant's handout, delivered to the participants of the HBT group.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactAndré Mallmann

Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre da Universidade Federal do Rio Grade do Sul

almallmann@hcpa.edu.br+55(51)3359-8000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)