Skip to content

Study of analysis of pain improvement in patients with sacral pain who underwent interventional procedure in pain with the radiofrequency technique.

Retrospective study of the analgesic effect of denervation of sacroiliac joints with radiofrequency in patients with sacral pain

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-8x52jd
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-02-10
Start date
2019-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low back pain

Interventions

Three different techniques of denervation of the sacroiliac joints will be compared, being they conventional technique, pulsed and refrigerated.Total of 78 patients evaluated. In the denervation group
Procedure/surgery

Sponsors

Ligia Ferreira de Toledo Kawamoto
Lead Sponsor
Ligia Ferreira de Toledo Kawamoto
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 90 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The study will be done with approval by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital Vera Cruz and the Federal University of São Paulo. Data from the medical records of patients submitted to radiofrequency for lumbar pain in unilateral or bilateral sacroiliac joint from January 2015 to December 2017 will be collected. Will be collected from the medical records: Patient data: age, sex, height, weight Pain characteristics: location, duration, intensity, start time. Previous treatments Medications in use for pain and dose Relief of pain after radiofrequency denervation (X scale), evaluated for X months. Need for medication or other techniques for pain relief after radiofrequency. Adverse effects and complications

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient not submitted only procedure of denervation of the sacroiliac joints with pulsed radiofrequency, conventional or refrigerated techniques.Patients who were not submitted to the procedure from January 2015 to December 2017.Excluded medical records that did not have all the information studied

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the analgesic effect of each applied technique. It is expected to find the best technique applied in terms of analgesia for the patient.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Need for medication or other techniques for pain relief after radiofrequency and presence of adverse effects and complications after radiifrequency procedure

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactLigia de Toledo Kawamoto

UNIFESP

ligiatoledo_med@hotmail.com19981017307

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)