Skip to content

Effects of diagnostic errors on variability of assessment and intervention with acupuncture

Effects of diagnostic errors on Interrater Reliability for Pattern differentiation and Acupoints prescription

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-8whr7r
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2015-06-01
Start date
2014-11-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, nervous system diseases.

Interventions

This is an cross-sectional study without any intervention. This is an observational study to investigate the effects of diagnostic errors in inter-rater reliability for pattern differentiation and acu
Other

Sponsors

Centro Universitário Augusto Motta
Lead Sponsor
Centro Universitário Augusto Motta
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adults; either gender; bachelor degree in any health-related course recognized by the National Ministry of Education, including biomedicine, nursing, physical therapy, speech therapy, physician, nutrition, dentistry, psychology, and occupational therapy; postgraduate training in acupuncture; signature of the informed consent form after reading about the objectives, potential risks and benefits for participating in this research.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Professionals with postgraduate training not registered at the respective professional council; clinical practice less than one year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Higher interrater agreement for the cases simulated with correct diagnosis verified by the minimal diference of 10% in the agreement coefficient (kappa, iota) in comparison with the cases simulated with misdiagnosis.;Higher diagnostic performance of specialists for cases simulated with correct diagnosis as assessed by accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values with at least 10% different from the cases simulated with misdiagnosis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Positive association between controlling variables (age, clinical practice period) and the diagnostic accuracy as assessed with the Spearman's correlation coefficient of at least 0.41.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactArthur Ferreira

Centro Universitário Augusto Motta

arthur_sf@ig.com.br+55(21) 3868-9797

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)