Skip to content

Efficacy of the use of Polypropylene Membranes in bone preservation after tooth extraction

Effectiveness of using a Polypropylene Membrane in preserving the alveolar ridge after tooth extraction

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-8v8j464
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-12-09
Start date
2025-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alveolar Bone Loss

Interventions

This is a two-arm, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial. The experimental group consists of the extraction of a posterior tooth (premolar or molar) with the placement of a non-resorbable

Sponsors

Associação Pro Ensino Superior em Novo Hamburgo
Lead Sponsor
Curso de Odontologia da Universidade Feevale
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Be over 18 years of age; both genders; voluntarily agree to participate in the study and sign the Informed Consent Form; have no allergies or intolerances to polypropylene; require extraction of a posterior tooth (premolar or molar); have no fistulas; not be undergoing orthodontic treatment; not use removable partial dentures that have support on the teeth adjacent to the tooth to be extracted; not be taking medications that interfere with bone remodeling processes (e.g., bisphosphonates); have adjacent teeth to the tooth to be extracted

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Express interest in withdrawing from the study by revoking consent; present ridge characteristics that make membrane placement unfeasible after extraction; fail to attend the tomographic exams at the scheduled times; present complications after the extraction that require surgical reintervention or the prescription of antibiotics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Outcome name: Dimensional change of the alveolar ridge (bone thickness and height; Metric/assessment method: Measurement of the width and height of the alveolar ridge by means of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), at times T0 (preoperative), T1 (immediately or up to 24 hours after the intervention) and T2 (3 months postoperative). Standardized measurement using tomographic guide with hyperdense marker; Assessment time: T0 (preoperative), T1 (up to 24 hours after extraction), T2 (3 months after surgery)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Outcome name: Alveolar ridge bone volume; Metric/assessment method: Volume difference measured by intraoral scanning, with superimposition of STL files obtained at suture removal (E1) and after 3 months (E2). Software assessment with images of regions with dimensional alteration. Assessment time: E1 (7 to 10 days after surgery), E2 (3 months after surgery);Outcome name: Postoperative discomfort reported by participants; Assessment metric/method: 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, applied immediately after suturing (D0), 24h after (D1), between 7 to 10 days (D2) and 3 months (D3). The distance between the beginning of the line and the marking will be measured in millimeters; Assessment time: D0 (immediately after surgery), D1 (24h), D2 (7 to 10 days), D3 (3 months)

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactFernando Portella

Universidade Feevale

portellaff@yahoo.com.br+55-51-992351597?

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)