Skip to content

Selfcervix: Self-collection strategy for cervical Cancer screening

Analysis of alternative methods for cervical Cancer screening

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-8s839dj
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-08-11
Start date
2016-06-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervix Uteri

Interventions

Non-inferiority, single-arm, unblinded and non-randomized study, where 150 patients from participating institutions from June 2016 to April 2019 with suspected alteration of cervical lesions evaluated

Sponsors

Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo
Lead Sponsor
Ziel Biosciences Pesquisa, Desenvolvimento e Diagnóstico LTDA
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
25 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women between 25 and 65 years old referred for colposcopy due to Pap smear with suspicious changes of neoplastic cervical lesions and/or positive HPV (Human Pappiloma Virus) PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction). All must agree to participate and sign the Free and Informed Consent Form in advance.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant women; immunocompromised women; women who have not yet started sexual activity; or those who have already undergone chemotherapy or radiotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome: It is expected to find the non-inferiority of self-collection using the SelfCervix device in relation to collection with a health professional for HPV tests based on studies in the literature carried out in countries that used HPV tests with other self-collectors for cervical cancer screening, such as the United States and Europe.;Outcome found 1: The outcome of the study demonstrated that self-collection with the SelfCervix device was not inferior to professional collection (p=0.01) in the evaluation of HPV DNA and liquid-based cytology, demonstrating 87% accuracy (for both tests), sensitivity of 86% (HPV) and 64% (cytology) and specificity of 90% (HPV) and 100% (cytology). A p<0.05 value was considered significant, with a 95% confidence interval.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Não são esperados desfechos secundários.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactCaroline de Farias

Ziel Biosciences Pesquisa, Desenvolvimento e Diagnóstico LTDA

cbfarias@zielbiosciences.com+5551981108137

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)