Skip to content

Resistive Training in Coronariopathy with Diastolic Dysfunction

Progressive Resistive Training combined with Inspiratory Muscle Training in Coronariopathy with Diastolic Dysfunction: Clinico-functional cardiovascular outcomes

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-8rgwcq
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-11-21
Start date
2019-11-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Interventions

Study with intervention type physical training in individuals with heart failure (HF) with preserved HFPEF)or reduced ejection fraction (HFREF. During randomization, individuals will be allocated in t
Device
Other
E02.760.169.063.500.387.875
G11.427.410.698.277
E01.370.225.998.110

Sponsors

Hospital Universitário Maria Rosa Pedrossian
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
35 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of both sexes; Age between 35 and 75 years old; Patients with chronic coronary artery disease by clinical and angiographic criteria, in different degrees of diastolic dysfunction by echocardiographic criteria; Patients who are stable for more than 30 days of symptoms, in regular use of prescription drugs; Patients with HFPEF (LVEF higher than 50%) or HFREF (Ejection Fraction between 30% and 50%);Assessed patients should be able to perform transthoracic doppler echocardiography, inspiratory muscle assessment, peripheral vascular doppler, treadmill exercise cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and to respond to the Minnesota quality of life questionnaire voluntarily before and after the experimental intervention

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: HF patients and EF lower than 30%; HF patients and EF higher than 30% in Functional Class IV; Recent myocardial infarction (less than 30 days), unstable angina (more than 30 days) or sustained complex ventricular arrhythmia; Severe valvulopathies with surgical indication; Uncontrolled SAH: systolic BP higher than 190 mmHg or diastolic BP higher than 120 mmHg; Inability to exercise on a treadmill due to severe neuromuscular, neurological, orthopedic or psychological limitation; Patients without echocardiographic criteria of diastolic dysfunction by either pulsed or tissue Doppler; Patients with nonobstructive coronary insufficiency or nonatherosclerotic coronary heart disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome of this study is the Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Slope. We estimate an increase in the primary outcome value greater than the 5% coefficient of variation after 12-weeks training

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Increased exercise capacity by measuring maximal oxygen uptake greater than 7% in the treatment group compared to the control group;Significant reduction in exercise natriuretic peptide serum neurohormone level in the treatment group compared to the control group ;A statistically significant increase in the variation of the brachial artery caliber after treatment compared to the control group

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactEduardo Reigota

Hospital Universitário Maria Rosa Pedrossian

eduardoreigota@gmail.com+55(67)33457001

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)