Pelvic organ prolapse.
Conditions
Interventions
Participants will be randomized to two different groups. Group 1 (experimental group): 61 women will use the pessary associated with the TMAP (Pelvic floor muscle training) and Group 2 (comparison gro
E02.760.169.063.500.387.875
Sponsors
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Women with pelvic organ prolapse; staging equal to or greater than two; present intact vaginal mucosa and prolapsed region; are without signs and / or symptoms of urinary tract infection; without vaginal infections
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Women whose insertion of the pessary was not successful; women with a modified Oxford score less than two
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| A reduction in prolapse is expected, evaluated by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q): measurements in centimeters evaluated at the first medical consultation for the evaluation of women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and after the last evaluation of the Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (12th week of training). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Assess quality of life: in the first week (week 1) using the Quality of Life Questionnaire - Prolapse, and after the end of the interventions, in the 36th week of follow-up. It is expected that it has a low score, which indicates a good quality of life.;To evaluate the performance of the Pelvic Floor Muscles by the modified Oxford scale and by the Peritron®, evaluated in the first consultation for evaluation of the woman with therapeutic indication of the vaginal pessary and in the last evaluation of the Training of the Pelvic Floor Muscles (12th week of training). An increase of at least one level on the Oxford scale and an increase in the performance of the Pelvic Floor Muscles is expected.;Assess sexual function through the score of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire, verified at the first consultation to assess women with therapeutic indication for a vaginal pessary and after the end of the interventions at the 36th week. Improvement in sexual function of at least one level above baseline is expected.;Assess adherence to the proposed treatment. A minimum of 70% adherence to treatment is expected.;Evaluate a complaint of Urinary Incontinence and/or Anal Incontinence: It is expected that it will present improvement in urinary and fecal symptoms.;Evaluate pessary number: Evaluated at the insertion visit and at the 36th week of follow-up. It is expected to reduce the ideal pessary number by at least one number. | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactAngela Silva
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Outcome results
None listed