Comparison between two types of ergonomic adjustments in cycling

Comparison Between 3D Kinematic Bikefitting and Traditional Bicycle Adjustment Recommendations: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

REBEC

Registry ID

RBR-8q96hsh

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2021-12-09

Start date

2020-09-07

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malaise and Fatigue (ICD10:R53)

Interventions

Design This research is a prospectively registered, two-arm, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial, placebo-controlled by minimal intervention. Its design was based on the checklist of The Consoli

where is located the private biomechanic laboratory used for in-person analysis and measurements. The sample size calculation followed the example of a similar study in which some of these subjecti

must have a private mountain bike and be familiar with it for at least six months, maintaining a trai

H02.070

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: amateur ciclists

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: continuous use of painkillers; ride with proposed bike setup

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
riding pain measured by Visual Analog Scale;Discomfort measured by Feeling Scale	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
There are no secondary outcomes	—

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactRobson Scoz

Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo

robsonscoz@icloud.com55-11-30031189

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)