Aphasia
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Patients aged between 30 and 80 years will be included; of both sexes, diagnosis of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, absence of cognitive deficits (assessed by the MMSE - Mini Mental State Examination, score greater than 18 ; All degrees of motor impairment according to the classification Fugl-Meyer score (total score 0 to 66 points): severe (Fugl-Meyer score 0 to 15 points), severe or moderate (16 to 34 Fugl-Meyer points), moderate/mild (35-53 Fugl points -Meyer) and mild (54 to 66 Fugl Meyer points); Aphasic patients will be evaluated by the Boston Naming Test and Montreal-Toulouse Battery Test (MTL-Brazil), in all degrees of impairment: alert for neuropsychological deficit (- 1.0 and -1.5), moderate to severe deficit (-1.6 and -2.0), presence of very severe deficit (less than or equal to -2.0), does not suggest cognitive deficit (greater than - 1.0)
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patients who present the following conditions will be excluded: clinical evidence of multiple brain lesions or other associated neurological diseases; peripheral neuropathies, leprosy, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis; other upper and lower motor neuron pathologies; history of psychiatric illness including drug and alcohol abuse; orthopedic deformities installed in the upper limbs. Those who are undergoing rehabilitation treatment during the collection (Occupational Physiotherapy and/or Speech Therapy) will not participate in the research. Patients with receptive types of aphasia (assessed by the MTL-Brazil test) will also be excluded. In addition to these, due to contraindication for the application of tDCS, patients with intracranial metallic implants will be excluded; pregnancy; use of medication that interferes with cortical excitability; history of seizures and/or epilepsy.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| It is expected to find a relationship between upper limb motor function and language functions by the degree of impairment of these skills in order to establish a predictive factor of recovery and to investigate whether central therapy associated with peripheral may be superior to increase function in both. the functions (motor and language) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| We will observe the motor and language skills by level of severity of the injury, as well as the correlation of upper limb motor function with language | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Universidade Federal de Sergipe