Skip to content

Hypothesis Trial: Hypofractionated versus Conventional Radiotherapy with Concurrent Cisplatin in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Hypothesis Phase III: Hypofractionated or Conventional Radiotherapy with Concurrent Cisplatin in Cervical Cancer Stages IIB-IIIB-IIIC

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-8pdg8hq
Enrollment
350
Registered
2026-07-20
Start date
2026-08-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Invasive cervical lesion Cervical Cancer

Interventions

This is a phase III open-label randomized controlled clinical trial with two parallel arms where a total of 350 eligible women with locally advanced cervical cancer will be randomly allocated to one o

Sponsors

Liga Norte Riograndense Contra o Câncer
Lead Sponsor
Liga Norte Riograndense Contra o Câncer
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 18 years or older; diagnosis of primary cervical carcinoma stages IB to IIIC, with a maximum of three positive pelvic lymph nodes and no tumor extension to the middle or lower third of the vagina or involvement of the common iliac chain; histological type adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma; no prior pelvic radiotherapy or chemotherapy; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status between zero and two; laboratory tests with adequate hematological, renal, and hepatic functions; negative pregnancy test for patients with childbearing potential

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Histology other than squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma; prior treatment for cervical carcinoma, except conization; other prior or current malignant neoplasms, with the exception of basal cell carcinoma of the skin, untreated and controlled chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, unless disease-free for at least five years; presence of ectopic pelvic kidney; laparotomy for staging or treatment; pregnant, lactating, or childbearing age women without adequate contraceptive measures; patients with distant metastases or para aortic lymph node involvement proven by imaging or biopsy; patients with other clinical conditions that preclude the use of chemotherapy or radiotherapy; patients on neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected to evaluate disease-free survival at three years, verified by measuring the time elapsed between the initial curative treatment and the appearance of local, regional, or distant recurrence, or death related to cancer, through the observation and recording of survival rates estimated by the kaplan meier method and compared using the log rank test;Expected outcome 1: It is expected to evaluate overall survival, verified by measuring the time elapsed between the date of initial treatment and death from any cause, using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression to analyze hazard ratios and survival percentages throughout the five-year follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 2: It is expected to evaluate the clinical response rate to treatment, verified through the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version one point one, using physical and imaging examinations to analyze the percentages of complete response or partial response maintained for at least three months;Expected outcome 3: It is expected to evaluate acute and late gastrointestinal and geniturinary toxicities greater than or equal to grade two, verified through the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version six point zero, using weekly reviews and follow-up consultations to record the incidence and severity of adverse effects;Expected outcome 4: It is expected to evaluate the pattern of disease failure and recurrence, verified through physical examination, radiological studies, or pathological specimen, using post-treatment follow-up to map and document the exact location of local, regional, or distant progression;Expected outcome 5: It is expected to evaluate quality of life related to treatment, verified through the application of the validated questionnaires from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer modules C30 and CX24, using interviews before treatment, post-treatment, and at six, twelve, and twenty-four months to analyze scores and indexes of general and specific symptoms

Countries

BR

Contacts

Public ContactEdilmar Santos

Liga Norte Riograndense Contra o Câncer

edilmar.moura@liga.org.br+55-84-40095597

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026