Skip to content

Comparison between Internal Jugular Vein versus Axilar Vein for implantable ports

Internal Jugular vein versus Axilar Vein with single-incision for Implantable Ports: a prospective and randomized study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-8p484w
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-12-14
Start date
2017-04-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malignant neoplasm, postoperative complications.

Interventions

Comparison between internal jugular vein versus via axilar vein with single-incision for placement of implantable ports in cancer patients. We are recruiting 240 patients and randomizing 120 for each
Procedure/surgery

Sponsors

AC Camargo Cancer Center
Lead Sponsor
AC Camargo Cancer Center
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Minimum age 18; cancer patients; only catheter for chemotherapy; ECOG (performance status) from 0 to 2; signed informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Non compliance; anticoagulant therapy; coagulopathy (platelet count below 50,000 and/or protrombin time above 18s); death within 30 days after the procedure; another catheter in superior vena cava; previous long term catheter in superior vena cava; obesity (IBM>40 Kg/m2).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Early complications in 30 days during clinical assessment and the presence of one of the follow complications: intra-operative complications, such as pneumothorax, hemothorax, vascular injury, cardiac arrhythmia, hematoma.;Post-operative until 30 days complications identified through clinical assessment such as wound infections, catheter related bacteremia, catheter disfunction, catheter related deep venous thrombosis, reservoir extrusion and skin erosion.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Late complications, the same complications used in primary outcome, but within 30 days and 6 months identified during clinical assessment.;Quality of life questionnaire to evaluate quality of life. Measured by the presence of statistically significant diference between both arms.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactBruno Pignataro

AC Camargo Cancer Center

brunosoriano86@yahoo.com.br551121895000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)