Skip to content

Pollutant gas emissions in the treatment of Kidney Stones by External Shock Wave therapy compared to Laser Stone Fragmentation

Carbon emission in the treatment of Ureteral Stones by Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy compared to Transureteroscopic Ureterolithotripsy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-8mn88b2
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-10-06
Start date
2022-09-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ureteral Calculi

Interventions

This is a randomized, controlled, two-arm, single-blind clinical trial. The experimental group will include 55 adult patients with ureteral stones undergoing transureteroscopic ureterolithotripsy with

Sponsors

University of São Paulo
Lead Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Consecutive patients aged over 18 years with symptomatic ureterolithiasis; who underwent primary lithotripsy at the Endourology Unit or the Emergency Department of the Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients undergoing retreatment; pregnant women; those unable to continue treatment at the Institution; patients with ureteral stones smaller than 5 mm or larger than 15 mm; patients with active urinary tract infection or with coagulopathies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected Outcome 1: Measurement of carbon dioxide emissions involved in the lithotripsy process (ureteroscopy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy), calculated through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) using the Ecoinvent database. The outcome will be expressed as carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per cubic centimeter of treated stone.;Observed Outcome 1: An average carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emission of 26.7 kg per patient was observed in the ULT group, and 9.4 kg per patient in the ESWL group. Data were obtained through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), considering materials, energy, hospital usage, and waste disposal. It was confirmed that ULT has a greater environmental impact than ESWL.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected Outcome 1: To evaluate the efficiency of stone fragmentation by the amount of carbon dioxide emitted, as well as to analyze the materials involved in the processes. The assessment will be carried out through clinical and tomographic evaluation at 30 days postoperatively, combined with emission estimates based on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology and the Ecoinvent database.;Observed Outcome 1: A complete stone resolution rate of 93% was observed in the ULT group and 71% in the ESWL group. Data were obtained through imaging exams performed four weeks after the procedure, using the absence of fragments =4 mm as the success criterion.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactCaio Suartz

Universidade de Sao paulo

caio.v_suartz@hotmail.com+1 (581) 578-3004

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)