Skip to content

Differences between dentures made the traditional way and those made with 3D printing

Conventional complete dentures vs. 3D-printed complete dentures

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-8k2tq29
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-03-04
Start date
2026-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Jaw

Interventions

This is a non-randomized, double-blind (participants and researchers responsible for data analyses will not know which group the participant belongs), two-arm crossover clinical trial. Experimental gr
the OHIP-EDENT questionnaire will be administered in interview format
2) masticatory performance
using the chewing gum method
the participant will be instructed to perform 20 chewing cycles
the chewed gum will be removed from the mouth and a colorimetric evaluation performed
3) quality of the prostheses, will be evaluated by an experienced operator with the Sato score
4) functionality of the complete dentures, will be evaluated by an instrument that provides a score of 0-10
and 5) need for maintenance and adjustments and retention of the prostheses
and 6) user preference.

Sponsors

Universidade de Pernambuco
Lead Sponsor
Universidade de Pernambuco
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants who have been completely edentulous for at least 1 year; individuals seeking oral rehabilitation at the complete denture service at the Faculty of Dentistry of Pernambuco (FOP/UPE); participants who agree to participate in this research by signing the Informed Consent Form; participants over 18 years of age; both sexes; participants classified as class 1 or class 2 in the Dental Prosthesis Diagnostic Index for complete edentulism; participants with sufficient systemic health to attend clinical appointments and the discernment to answer the questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Individuals with retentive ridges (indication for surgery); individuals with neoplastic and non-neoplastic proliferative processes in the oral mucosa; individuals with alterations in the oral mucosa resulting from microbial infections; individuals with neuromuscular disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of life and user satisfaction with complete dentures, measured by the OHIP-EDENT questionnaire (Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous patients), applied to each group after three months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Masticatory performance, measured by chewing test with two-color chewing gum and electronic colorimetric evaluation using the free ViewGum® software;Quality of complete dentures, measured clinically using the Sato Score instrument, based on the following factors: anterior teeth arrangement, interocclusal distance, mandibular prosthesis stability, occlusion, articulation, mandibular prosthesis retention and mandibular prosthesis extension;Functionality of complete dentures, verified using the FAD instrument (functional assessment of dentures), based on the following factors: free functional space, occlusion, articulation, maxillary retention, maxillary stability and mandibular stability;Retention of prostheses, performed manually using a subjective retention scale and digital retention test with a portable digital force measuring instrument;Need for maintenance and adjustments, recorded throughout the study period based on the number of clinical visits required during the three-month follow-up

Countries

BR

Contacts

Public ContactSandra Moraes

Universidade de Pernambuco

sandra.moraes@upe.br+55(81)31841260

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026