Dental Caries
Conditions
Interventions
All participants and their guardians will receive flossing hygiene instruction, fluoridated toothpaste and dietary advice. Patients will receive brush and floss prophylaxis before receiving treatment.
E06.323.428
Sponsors
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Eligibility
Age
3 Years to 9 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 3 to 9 years old who have at least one class I or II caries lesion in deciduous molars; 198 teeth; who radiographically have at least two thirds root, and lesions D1 and D2, where restorative treatment is indicated. E1 Radiolucidity in the outer half of enamel; E2 Radiolucidity in the inner half of enamel; D1 Radiolucidity in the external third of dentin; D2 Radiolucidity in the middle third of dentin; D3 Radiolucidity in the internal third of dentin.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: spontaneous pain; fistula; mobility not compatible with the period of root resorption; advanced rhizolysis more than 2/3 of root resorption; participants who were included in the course were not included in the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected outcome 1: Survival rate of occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations performed with resin modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars under absolute and relative isolation. ;Found outcome 1: There was no significant difference in survival rates between groups (p=0.17). Older age (HR = 2.81 [95% CI: 1.47-5.44]) and a higher rate of gingival bleeding (HR = 0.47 [95% CI: 0.23-0.99]) were associated with restorative failures. No patient had painful symptoms, pulp outcomes.;Expected outcome 2: Arrestment of occlusal and occlusoproximal lesions restored under relative and absolute isolation. ;Found outcome 2: No patient had radiographic changes compatible with lesion progression. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Found outcome 1: The percentage of patients who reported having had no discomfort or little discomfort after the restorative procedure was 86.1%. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the level of discomfort according to the Chi-square test (p=0.745). There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding the number of restored surfaces (p=0.404), side of the arch (p=0.961), type of arch (p=0.108) and type of molar restored (p=0.708). ;Expected outcome 1: Children discomfort during restorative treatment. | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactJonas Rodrigues
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Outcome results
None listed