Skip to content

Association of the elastic bandage to Manual Therapy in the neck pain

Association of the Kinesio Taping to Manual Therapy in the neck pain

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-8g9dbc
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2015-06-01
Start date
2014-03-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck pain

Interventions

On experimental group 1, 5 participants were chosen at random, 4 women and 1 man with neck pain who were treated with physical therapy techniques such as stretching, 2 times 30 seconds, massage for 2
Other
E02.190.599
E07.101.036

Sponsors

Faculdade Integral Diferencial
Lead Sponsor
Multifisio Clínica de Fisioterapia
Collaborator
Faculdade Integral Diferencial
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
21 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Target sample of 10 volunteers of both genders who sought physiotherapy service complaining of neck pain and age between 21 and 30 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Historic injury in cervical whiplash; diagnosis of pathologies associated like neoplasia and thrombosis; presence of open wounds; allergies to bandage; use of drugs a week before the study or during its accomplishment and that are not available to participate in all stages of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reduction of cervical pain in the period of one week checked by using the Visual Analogue Scale of Pain from the analysis of a variation of less than 10% percent in measurements pre and post intervention;Increased cervical range of motion in the period of one week checked through goniometry of the cervical spine from the analysis of a variation of less than 10% percent in measurements pre and post intervention;Increased muscle strength in cervical period of one week checked through of strength tests of the cervical spine from the analysis of a variation of less than 10% percent in measurements pre and post intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Significant improvement in pain and cervical spine range of motion; absolute gain in the numerical values of cervical muscle strength;Significant decrease in cervical pain; improvement in absolute values of cervical range of motion; no significant gain of cervical muscle strength

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactAna;Luiz Machado de Carvalho;Batista Pereira da Silva

Universidade do Vale do Paraíba-UNIVAP;Faculdade Integral Diferencial

anaflaviaparaibana@hotmail.com;luyzfernando2@hotmail.com+55 (86) 9986 1242;+55 (86) 9900 7795

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)