Social isolation
Conditions
Interventions
Research developed remotely, through virtual platforms. Each participant performed a screening at the beginning and end of the project, with an assessment of lifestyle and mental health, through quest
and 2) Control Group, with 20 students who did not participate in the intervention stage. At the end of the program, all evaluations were performed again with all participants involved.
The physical e
2) 30-40 minutes of multi-joint exercises for upper and lower limbs
3) 5-10 minutes of intermittent cardiorespiratory activities
and 4) 5 minutes of relaxation and calm down. The exercises were performed using their own body weight, in addition to objects available in the participants' homes, such as buckets, gallons, bottles,
G11.427.410.698.277
Sponsors
Profa. Dra. Iane de Paiva Novais
Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia - UESB
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Female students; age from 18 years; enrolled in undergraduate or graduate courses offered by the State University of Southwest Bahia, on the Jequié, Vitória da Conquista or Itapetinga campuses; no restrictions for the practice of physical activity; with availability to participate in the activities proposed by the researchers; agreement and signature of the Free and Informed Consent Form
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Not answering the questionnaires in full; answer one or more questions in the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire in the affirmative; and or present any physical or mental condition that prevents the performance of exercises
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| It is expected to find an improvement in Quality of Life, evaluated through the SF-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire, which is formed by eight domains, functional capacity, physical aspects, pain, general health status, vitality, social aspects, emotional and mental health. Data were collected one week before the intervention and one week after the intervention. The SF-36 score can range from 0 to 100, in which higher scores indicate better health status, so we will observe, through pre- and post-intervention assessment, whether there was an improvement in the health status of the participants.;It is expected to find an improvement in Sleep Quality, verified through the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. This instrument involves factors related to the participant's last month's sleep, assessing subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disorders, use of sleeping medications and dysfunction during the day. The scores are summed and range from 0 to 21, in which sleep quality is classified as: a) Good: 0 to 4 points; b) Bad: 5 to 10 points; and c) Presence of sleep disorder: greater than 10 points. In this way, we will observe, through the pre and post intervention evaluation, if there was an improvement in the sleep quality of the participants. Data were collected one week before the intervention and one week after the intervention.;It is expected to find an improvement in symptoms of stress, anxiety and depression, verified through the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21), which is a set of three scales, each with 7 items, designed to measure the emotional states of depression, anxiety and stress. Scores from 0 to 3 are assigned, being classified as normal, mild, moderate, severe and extremely severe. Thus, we will observe, through the pre and post intervention evaluation, if there was an improvement in the symptoms of stress, anxiety and depression. Data were collected one week before the intervention and one wee | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary outcomes are not expected | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactIane Novais
Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia - UESB
Outcome results
None listed